I feel like it’s usually a poor understanding of epistemology wrt the conditions of data being gathered (e.g. not understanding how overpolicing warps arrest rates, the difference between conviction and actual guilt, etc.). Could you explain your thinking?
“Bad math usually leads to racism” is actually quite a good line that applies outside of this issue too.
I feel like it’s usually a poor understanding of epistemology wrt the conditions of data being gathered (e.g. not understanding how overpolicing warps arrest rates, the difference between conviction and actual guilt, etc.). Could you explain your thinking?