The bias of English Wikipedia is inherently pro-western, I already explained you, you just lack the literacy to understand that. If even Wikipedia portrays the atrocities, it’s because they are so flagrant and patent that they’ve become popular knowledge in the west.
If you prefer, I can cite from ProleWiki next time, but I doubt you’d read that
Citing Natopedia as a source, are we?
The bias of English Wikipedia is inherently pro-western, I already explained you, you just lack the literacy to understand that. If even Wikipedia portrays the atrocities, it’s because they are so flagrant and patent that they’ve become popular knowledge in the west.
If you prefer, I can cite from ProleWiki next time, but I doubt you’d read that