Insulting doesn’t even come close to describing what’s wrong with this

    • christian [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I literally never thought about this before - couldn’t there just be a revolving door where legal teams sue and settle for basically nothing, then get lucrative contracts from the company they settled against while the company can’t be sued again?

      • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It depends. The law firm sues on behalf of a class of affected individuals/entities (i.e. customers who were wronged) but they can’t do that without your permission. Sometimes this permission is implied if you don’t respond to a notice, so it’s opt-out. Sometimes it is opt-in. Not sure about this one, but you do have a choice to decline representation and theoretically pursue your own legal claim since you wouldn’t be bound by the settlement. But in practice, you aren’t gonna be able to successfully sue a large corporation on your own. That’s the point of class-action lawsuits.

        I guess in theory a corporation could set up these flimsy settlements as a sort of inoculation against later claims, but I think that wouldn’t really work in practice. They would have to do this for every possible line of complaint, which is near infinite for a sufficiently large organization.