• antsu@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    10 days ago

    Can I pick 2 and have them talk to each other instead? Would love to watch Hawking get Newton up to speed on some stuff.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    10 days ago

    Are they time traveling to see me, or am I time traveling to see them?

    Because if it’s the latter, Hawking on June 28, 2009.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        I am by no means excusing anything. In fact, Feynman, Einstein and Edison have their issues too.

        Bohr, was Dutch…

        Leonardo was left handed?

        Anyway Marie Curie would be at least as interesting to talk to as any of them, just maybe bring personal dosimeter for peace of mind.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    9 days ago

    “So, did you ever have any plans to build that helicopter thing you drew?”

    “Chi sei? Dove sono? Come sono arrivato qui?”

    “Sorry, what?”

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      You could use a phone to translate what people who speak in modern languages are saying, but I don’t know how well it would translate to and from 15th century Italian.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    10 days ago

    Tesla. I feel there’s so much we don’t know, let alone understand, about his ideas. Have we overly sane/crazy washed him?

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    10 days ago

    None. I give my spot to someone who wouldn’t waste it.

    I can’t speak on their level, and I’m okay with that. I’ve worked around some absolutely amazing geniuses in my career and I’m happy to be the worker bees in the arrangement. I’m no slouch, and I’ve done my own share of really cool stuff, but I wouldn’t waste such an opportunity on me.

    Give it to the Steve Baumels, the Tomas Bartas and the Jeff Linds of the world, the unsung bright spots in our tech march forward.

    I’ll save everyone a spot at lunch and try to get in on the group photo.

    • ns1@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      This was my first thought as well, sadly I’m probably not clever enough to fully appreciate and understand any of these people. If I’m not allowed to transfer my place then at least I can have some fun telling Da Vinci about planes and stuff

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I spoke with Mr Baumel, socially for instance, on a few occasions.

        He carries on two conversations actively, about completely unrelated subjects, and can speak with authority on any of them in turn. And he’s listening to another conversation so if economics of late Sumeria or gauges of railways in Europe vs China get boring to him, he can ditch one and talk about artwork of early Iceland as vikings adapted their style with the change in local materials; or something.

        It’s dizzying to hear. He’s just not on our level.

  • stelelor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 days ago

    Feynman, mainly because he was an amazing professor and knows how to talk to people.

    Einstein and Newton disliked people, so they would be terrible conversationslists outside their areas of expertise. I think that was true of Leonardo as well. Edison is also out because he was a dick.

    • adhocfungus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      I was going to say Feynman for the same reason. Outside his classes it sounds like the guy was a lot of fun to be around.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I liked the part from his autobio where he recounts cracking safes open. Pretty fun stuff indeed. Less so the ones where he invents modern plastic and helps with the atom bomb

    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      You could absolutely blow leonardo’s mind away with modern knowledge such as “washing hands before performing surgery is good actually”

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah I was just reading a book that mentioned something Feynman said and it’s something I feel is true for me as well.

      Don’t remember word for word but it was something like “Any subject is interesting if you look deep enough.”

      I feel like Feynman and I could have a riveting conversation about knitting for 3 hours even though neither of us are passionate about it.

      Those are the people I want to talk to.

      • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Interesting that he supposedly said that, given how much he dunks on philosophers.

    • drath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Feynman’s way overrated, though. Sure, he was a smart enough guy to land a job on Manhattan project and university prof afterwards, but the only reason people know him are the books written by batshit crazy groupies (he didn’t write any) and based on his elderly ramblings, so none of the stories in those are even remotely true.

      • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        While not exactly on par with Einstein, Newton or Tesla, he did win a Nobel prize and is considered a luminary quantum physicist.

  • HiobsTriops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 days ago

    Hawking was probably way more familiar with the works, achievements and maybe even personal anecdotes of everyone in this post than I could ever hope to be. Thus, sitting down with him feels like the best deal.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      He could give lectures, but the computer massively slowed conversations. He also apparently had a bit of a temper. Some of his colleagues took to wearing steel toe cap shoes because of him (electric wheelchairs are heavy).

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Exactly what I was thinking. Plus he seemed to have a good sense of humor too. But on the other hand, it would take him much longer to respond to questions on the spot (usually he’d prepare answers ahead of time for interviews and such).

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        He had a good sense of humour when it was about how great he was. A bit of a notorious asshole in other regards.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        You’ll be the smartest person in the room (graveyard) as their brains have rotted away and you will win any discussion. They’ll have nothing to challenge your arguments. I don’t think this will have any scientific value though. Except maybe from a psychological perspective, as you’re an idiot trying to argue with a grave.