Bluesky had some controversy when it first came out. Now that it’s been around for a while, I’m curious what the consensus is. How does it compare to Mastodon? Is Bluesky now self-hostable and compatible with the Fediverse?

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It never had a chance. There’s no way to make profit selling ads and user data and have it be decentralized. They are conflicting goals.

    I’m not saying there aren’t other ways to make a profit on a decentralized platform, but they never said they had any other business model, so we had to assume that the traditional one was it, and we were right.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’m not saying I’m very knowledgeable but as your asking for the consensus. I think Bluesky is much better than twitter but it doesn’t properly embody the ideals of the fediverse: that is a decentralized network of instances but it really only has one main instance. It’s also heavily viewed as an alternative to twitter, people who like twitter but don’t like X or the way elon musk is running things so the same people who don’t like twitter go to X and therefore the community isn’t so much better.

    But who am I to say this I don’t even use twitter mastadon or Bluesky.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    13 hours ago

    VC financed social media at the start of its enshittification journey. Started interesting with open protocol but seems it has no ambitions of being open.

    Deleted my account 6 months ago and haven’t missed it.

  • nfreak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    It’s just twitter 2.0, may as well be closed source, and it’s a joke to call it decentralized. I’m only on there because the community I keep up with is mostly on there, but the site is literally unusable without the blocklist feature, which of its own is incredibly easy to abuse. It was far better when it was almost entirely a leftist space, before the big twitter exodus of liberals.

    Mastodon’s looking far better on the casual usability front lately so maybe folks will start moving over there soon.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Works fine. Most of the artists I followed from twitter moved there. and its quite a nice place.

    certainly more hospitable than the nazi platform, that’s for sure.

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    It’s not compatible at all. And bots acting as bridges isn’t compatibility.

    As for self hosting an instance that is federated with the official Bluesky instance, you will only be able to do that in your dreams. You can self host your own PDS though.

    Bluesky is the most centralized decentralized platform

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    First let’s kill X, that’s reason enough to use it for now. At least you’re still supporting more open protocols

  • www-gem@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    As far as I know Bluesky protocol is open-source but not its main app. Also, there are several apps available to use Mastodon. Additionally, note that Bluesky uses the AT Protocol (developed by Bluesky) while Mastodon uses ActivityPub (W3C standard) which is more friendly for third-party devs.

    As far as federation is concerned it’s still mostly centralized with Bluesky while Mastodon is fully federated.

    Something I personaly like as well with Mastodon is that the feeds don’t use algorithms.

    • 2910000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Mastodon builds on the ActivityPub protocol with its own API, but the last time I looked into it, the documentation of the API was poor, so it was difficult to develop for.

      I haven’t looked at the BlueSky docs so I can’t compare, but it sticks in my craw a bit seeing the words “friendly for third-party devs” being used in the same sentence with Mastodon

      • www-gem@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Not being a developer myself, the wording may not be the best sorry. The take home message was that Mastodon seems more prone to external development based on its protocol and the fact that more than 20 apps already exist (all platforms included).

        Outside of using several apps to use Mastodon, I personaly rely on its API only to add Mastodon posts as comments on my static blog.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s still for profit, not federated and closed source so honestly I don’t know why it’s being discussed here

      • James R Kirk@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        My bad, I’m not an expert here but it’s weird that it’s open source and yet nobody else can have a bluesky? Like could I download that code and make a bluesky for everyone? If so why has nobody else done it? why is there only one for profit bluesky?

        To answer your question though, no nothing has changed.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It turned out to be a Twitter clone from ten years ago and I realized I didn’t need that any more. If I didn’t need to reach some people who cannot overcome the hurdle the fediverse proper puts up before being enjoyable, I would not be using it today. But media popularity post-Elon-Twitter and relative ease of setup have given the platform relative heft. But it’s not open and not really federated so it’s masquerading and we don’t really want you know whose money is paying the bills behind the scenes either. If anything, the fediverse can learn from Bluesky a thing or two about onboarding people who cannot be asked to invest the time to make Mastodon enjoyable. It will take time, much more time, to get people, especially non-techy ones, to the new normal of being your own algorithm. I see Bluesky as a stepping stone in that direction that will survive in its own niche.

  • Brunacho@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    the closest thing to “compatible” is the bridge which is sort of creates a bot account on the other network that copies the source toots/¿blues?

  • Ŝan@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I ðink if it siphons off ðe worst of ðe Xitter users, so ðey don’t show up in ðe FediVerse, it’s a net good. A sort of self-imposed, centralized prison.

      • Ŝan@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Þanks for ðe spelling correction. I can’t exactly blame autocorrect, can I?

        Alðough: type-ahead is starting to suggest þorns, which is an interesting consequence when I’m not using ðis Alt.