Lemmy.one
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
comrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to guns@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 days ago

sometimes the gun just does that

hexbear.net

message-square
13
fedilink
86

sometimes the gun just does that

hexbear.net

comrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.net to guns@hexbear.netEnglish · 7 days ago
message-square
13
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    gun-hubris

  • rubber_chicken [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Wait, was the original meme problematic or why the remake?

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It’s just a meme template. I’m the original, the guy talking is about to cat call the girl, and the other guy stops him

      I think it was a PSA or something? Maybe just a sketch that should have been a PSA lol

      • rubber_chicken [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was apparently a gillette commercial.

        What I’m saying is that this isn’t the typical meme template:

        It’s weirdly close in that the outfits almost match (her stripey thing is just a top in the original but seems to go longer here and the black guy’s shirt has a lighter blue, if not white, in the original). The actors could all be completely different; I’m bad with faces. So was this a remake or an AI upscale or?

        • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          the facial expressions and poses are also different.

          mind blowing that you know the original enough to catch this. closely examining the two I think the OP is an AI recreation of the original. It’s not an just upscale because the changes are too drastic. Fascinating.

          • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            mind blowing that you know the original enough to catch this.

            I also thought it looked strange when I saw it, ie “that guy isn’t looking directly at the camera in the original”

          • rubber_chicken [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            If the original was a video, it could just be whatever on different screengrabs.

            • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              could be but the man on the left is missing his earring in the second panel.

          • comrade_pibb [comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            oh weird, i didn’t even notice

        • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Holy shit, I didn’t even notice. Yeah his teeth are fucked up. Why do this?!

        • kleeon [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think it might have been generated entirely from a prompt

      • kleeon [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s from Gillette 2019 commercial that all the right wingers got mad at

  • Super_Lumalo [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sometimes that someone is a thumb-cop lolololo trollface

guns@hexbear.net

guns@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !guns@hexbear.net

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

    1. NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
    1. Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
    1. Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
    1. Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
    1. Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put “CW: hunting” in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don’t derail other people’s threads.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 27 users / day
  • 134 users / week
  • 266 users / month
  • 660 users / 6 months
  • 6 local subscribers
  • 2.59K subscribers
  • 1.76K Posts
  • 3.24K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Wake [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
  • Sulvy [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.7
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org