I read the article yesterday hoping it would be funny-pathetic. It wasn’t.
“Several of the dinner guests, in interviews with The New York Times, said that they attended the event with the explicit intent of influencing Mr. Trump and U.S. financial regulations.” Pan-seared influence peddling with a citrus reduction. The prez is a pro at quid pro quo.
The NY Times opinion column whips up catnip for wine cave liberals at the same rate romance authors churn out endless novels for smut fiends
Matbe there’s a synergy there: Romance novels that teach theory.
“He doesn’t love you, he only loves your surplus value!”
@ gork summarize this book for me
I was disappointed. Sometimes out of nowhere she’ll throw in a French word. With a mention of food - I expected one. “The prez is a pro at quid pro quo.” is 2/10.
Xeni Jardin energy
The N卐T
