ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agoAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square94fedilinkarrow-up1890
arrow-up1890external-linkAbility of holding ruleslemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square94fedilink
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-23 months agoThat’s intentional. But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
minus-squarerambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoTechnically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.
That’s intentional.
But it’s also a really bad definition because it excludes most women over the age of 50.
Technically not. They were born with the ability to hold eggs but lost it. Not saying I agree with the transphobe, but the definition technically doesn’t exclude the elderly.