I didn’t mean to type those six words. I meant cat.
The only sane conclusion
Cat*
There’s always an xkcd
Actually, this XKCD doesn’t apply. It’s really the opposite case. I can’t figure out what cat should replace here.
title text
Title text:
I like trying to make it as hard as possible.
“I’d love to meet up, maybe in a few days? Next week is looking pretty empty. *witchcraft”
I think the least horrifying answer is word 2, referring to a consensual encounter between gay furries.
Or burly jazz musicians.
Cat cat in cat cat cat.
As a unix shell script:
(cat ‘cat’) in (cat ‘cat’ ‘cat’)Which should evaluate to true, because ‘cat’ can be found in ‘catcat’.
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `in’
A gold star for you! Now find a language where “cat cat in cat cat cat” is legal.
cat cat in cat cat catis legal Bash ifcatandinexist,"cat cat" in "cat cat cat"is Python.My point is that it’s not a shell script.
BOOOO!
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
Deleted
Cat cats in cat brother’s cat?
Cat dicks in this brothers bum
Big dicks cat his brothers bum
Did anyone ever find the answer
cat
Cat*
which word is supposed to be cat
cat
cat*
which word is supposed to be cat
cat
42
I did
Are the cats in your bum yet?
Big dick cats his brothers bum
Big dicks in cat brothers bum.
cat -A bum_sentence.txt
Big dicks in his brothers cat
Big dick cats in his brothers bum
They meant to just say “Cat.” Damn autocorrect!
Sounds like fever dream posting
