Thats just not what im saying.
Thats just not what im saying.
It can be a hobby, sure. But men having a hobby isnt was was being discussed at all. Nobody cares about men having hobbies, the issue is when this hobby is a potential threat to other people. Isnt this rather obvious?
Are you really pretending this is about men having hobbies?
“Exerting control” or “getting you cknditioned to follow orders” is the default motive for conspiracy theories that people cant think of a good motive for. I heard it a lot about using masks during covid.
For tex, i would suggest taking a basic template, and writing what you need, looking up how to do things as you need them. Theres a bunch of documentation on sites like overleaf, and you can learn a lot by looking at stackexchange threads.
The associativity thing also doesnt make sense.
That the script could incorporate some checking mechanisms and implement an “i dont know” for when the LLMs answers fails some tests.
They already do some of that but for other purposes, like censoring, or as by recent news, grok looks up musks opinions before answering questions, or to make more accurate math calculations they actually call a normal calculator, and so on…
They could make the LLM produce an answer A, then look up the question on google and ask that LLM to “compare” answer A with the main google results looking for inconsistencies and then return “i dont know” if its too inconsistent. Its not a rigorous test, but its something, and im sure the actual devs of those chatbots could make something much better than my half baked idea.
The chatbots are not just LLMs though. They run scripts in which some steps are queries to an LLM.
They have a point, chatbots are built on top of LLMs, they arent just LLMs.
They could be programmed to do some double/triple checking, and return “i dont know” when the checks are negative. I guess that would compromise the apparence of oracle that their parent companies seem to dissimulately push onto them.
Marx died? I didnt even know he was sick!
Outlets shouldnt be making predictions about the future with phrases that imply certainty. Especially when accusing someone.
They were deceived? When the oulet said she lied, they were claiming to know the future. They lied.
edge tracks user content while ddg doesnt. if you just rank by the height of the bar, different kinds of tracking get the same importance. But to me, tracking user content is between the worst kinds.
as someone that never took anything worthwhile out of linkedin, i kind of like that people post this stuff there :P
a volcano? isnt it cerro de san cristobal?
seems to me like AAA games always were about demonstrating new game technologies, showcasing a new graphics engine or something, not about entertaining/fun games. Like that Crysis franchise from around 2010, everyone wanted to have a pc that could play crysis, but nobody actually wanted to play that game.
obviously. you probably misread me.
Where you got that from? Looks like your imagining a whole other discussion there