

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Joss Whedon is in shambles.
He was well ahead of the curve on wearing red hats.
I’m mostly talking out of my ass, but I wonder if the access to copious amounts of hard drugs and alcohol that comes with money plays some part in it. Seeing if there’s anything to substantiate that idea, here’s a review of prior studies on the subject: Substance misuse and substance use disorders in sex offenders: A review.
The following is an excerpt from Table 1. History of substance abuse among sex offenders: retrospective file research:
Study | N | Sample(s) | Outcome measure | (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tzeng et al. (1999) | 532 | Child molesters | Substance abuse | 51.3 |
Alcohol misuse | 27.3 | |||
Cocaine misuse | 5.3 | |||
Other drug misuse | 14.0 | |||
Looman et al. (2004) | 25 | Child molesters | Alcohol misuse | 66.7 |
Drug misuse | 41.7 | |||
Carlstedt et al. (2005) | 70 | Child molesters with pedophilia | Substance abuse | 23 |
103 | Child molesters without pedophilia | Substance abuse | 33 |
(No, I don’t know what “child molesters without pedophilia” means.)
It basically continues like this. You can read the study yourself, but there does appear to be at least some correlation with drug and alcohol abuse when it comes to child molestation. Speaking anecdotally, I have also heard that cocaine use can lead to engaging in riskier sex acts that might not be appealing while sober.
I have no experience using cocaine, but being drunk has never made me want to sexually abuse children, so I suspect there must be some other personal defect which leads to these kinds of behaviors, with drugs/alcohol reducing inhibitions. Obviously, drug and alcohol use does not explain disgustingly rich people being disgustingly horrible creeps on its own, but it might be in the mix.
Same here basically, cross-eyed viewing is super easy for me but I have to work for minutes to perform wall-eyed viewing. I was really excited to see a post with cross-eyed stereograms.
I feel a thousand years old. People are mixing up George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four and the TV series Avatar.
In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Earth has been split into three large superstates: Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia. These three states are in perpetual war with one another, with Oceania’s alliances frequently shifting so that the current enemy and ally could change at any given moment and history is rewritten to affirm that the enemy and ally had always been in their present alignment.
Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. A large part of the political literature of five years was now completely obsolete. Reports and records of all kinds, newspapers, books, pamphlets, films, sound-tracks, photographs—all had to be rectified at lightning speed. Although no directive was ever issued, it was known that the chiefs of the Department intended that within one week no reference to the war with Eurasia, or the alliance with Eastasia, should remain in existence anywhere.
It’s entirely unclear whether the information above is factual within the reality of the novel. Whether the three states exist at all, whether they are at war, etc. is impossible to know because all information is managed by the Party. This could simply be another part of the propaganda machine. Ultimately, it doesn’t really matter if any evidence contrary to the Party’s currently approved history has been memory-holed.
“There is no war in Ba Sing Se” is the Avatar line, while “Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia” is generally the line that gets quoted from Ninteen Eighty-Four in similar contexts.
I’m not even really trying to scold folks who pirate, I do it too, I just don’t bother to grandstand about it. BFD I’m pirating 30 year old video games. Y’all think if I bought a 200 dollar used one on Ebay the original studio sees a dime of it? C’mon now.
Right here is where you’re essentially in agreement with the meme. You recognize that walking into a used game store and shoplifting their copy of the game is objectively worse than downloading an additional copy of the game, where you haven’t harmed somebody else to get yours.
I don’t think the argument is that “Piracy is completely and entirely victimless in all cases,” but that it’s a false equivalency to equate piracy with theft. They’re not the same thing, is all.
The “stone” with the words in it has a suspiciously uniform appearance. I wonder whether it might be concrete and the letters pressed into it while wet, in which case basically none of it is true.
I understand why this is wrong (order of operations dictates the division happens first, so it’s really 25 - 1 = 24), but why is it funny? I don’t mean “This isn’t funny,” I think I’m just missing the joke.
But if they were just re-using old recordings of her as Peach saying “Yeah!”, there’s every chance she wouldn’t get a call for that at all. Not getting a call back for the new Mario Kart doesn’t immediately mean “I’m not Peach any more,” until the game comes out and it becomes clear they haven’t used archive recordings and somebody else is Peach in it.
On the day before launch, she was basically Schrodinger’s Peach: “I haven’t recorded any new lines for this one, so I’m either in this game via archive recordings or I’ve been replaced.” She doesn’t need a phone call for either of those to be true.
I feel like Mario Kart is a bit ambiguous, there’s always the potential they could just re-use voice work from a previous entry rather than bringing all the actors in to go “Whoa! Ha-ha-ha. Luigi number one!” I don’t know if they still do this, but in the N64 era a lot of the same samples were used for Mario Kart, Mario Party, maybe other stuff, so the actors wouldn’t have been involved after the original recording sessions.
You might be thinking of Mbin, the other one of the “big three” (more like big one and the other two). Mbin’s biggest differentiating feature is microblog support. It’s hard to boil PieFed down to one main feature compared to Lemmy/Mbin, but anonymous voting and de-duplication of reposts might be the main ones. However, its focus is still on the (Lemmy-style) threaded side of the fediverse.
The web site has a list of differences between Lemmy and PieFed:
This list isn’t exhaustive; one major feature that’s not listed there is de-duplication, where reposts all get combined into a single post with a split comment section (one for each individual post).
“Can’t do an accent? Talk like C-3PO instead.”
🤔
Cook’s razor: “Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by screwing up git
commands.”
I’ve never understood the original (non-meme) version of this graph. Too much by whose standard? Maybe I wanted them extra buttery or sugary or whatever, make your own fucking cookies if you want them different.
Sounds like you’ve never had to endure Amateur Services.