

Seems fun :)
Beware that the check passport screen and the one before it may make it look like a papers please clone (which it definitely seems not to be after looking/reading further) - maybe move them further down in presentation order?
Seems fun :)
Beware that the check passport screen and the one before it may make it look like a papers please clone (which it definitely seems not to be after looking/reading further) - maybe move them further down in presentation order?
Not many Israeli are actually wanted by the ICC… IIRC the list is limited to just Netanyahu and Gallant.
Don’t get me wrong, I do hope we will someday have Nuremberg-style trials (minus the hangings, of course) for Israeli crimes against humanity, but I honestly doubt that will ever happen… actually, I doubt anyone (not even Netanyahu and Gallant) will serve even a single day in jail for them.
The whole point behind international institutions is that nations should back them, but nowadays no global superpower recognizes the ICC and all of them (plus a lot of regional powers) are governed by people who either is or would very much like to become an autocrat.
(if you are thinking “what about the EU?”… it’s not a global superpower, basically because it doesn’t want to be one)
We are probably on the same page (?) but you are definitely fighting a straw man now.
For clarity, let me just note that “actually going out and killing people with guns” is what, for example, the Russian did in Bucha and (part of) what Israel is doing every day in Gaza (plus innumerable other instances in recent and non-recent history).
I believe there are things worse than death
IMO deciding between death and other fates is something each person can only do for themselves. When it comes to deciding between death or any other fate for another, we must IMO always assume death is the worse option (unless of course the person says otherwise and we have reason to believe they are capable of decision making).
It’s worse than actually going out and killing people with guns.
Please, let’s avoid doing pointless rankings of war crimes: nothing of any value comes from arguing that one is worse than another.
empty rhetoric based on nothing
That’s what the current Italian government is all about
Yeah, it depends on how much you value clicks against your work ethics as a journalist
demanded they sign deportation papers accepting they had illegally entered Israel
Well, assaulting vessels in international waters and forcing the crew into your country is certainly illegal.
Oh, but it’s not a boycott of Israel - it’s a boycott against any nation whose leader is wanted for crimes against humanity.
An pro-Trump neonazi imbecile that breaks up with Trump is till a neonazi imbecile.
That said, I agree… he and his business should be as welcome in Europe as anybody else’s: we don’t discriminate.
Again and again this flawed logic where you either approve of everything Israel does or you are an antisemite… it’s high time we start distinguishing between the country of Israel and people of Jewish descent (Jewish people should learn the distinction too, seeing how this “antisemite” argument has been repeated by Jewish communities outside Israel).
As for Merz (and Germany, and Europe, and - alas - apparently the world in general), it’s a real shame that the moronic dichotomy of humanity into arbitrary “us” and “them” (and subsequent blaming of everything on “them”) is becoming mainstream rather than staying relegated to the far right (and groups of kids that bully other kids).
Ironically, this is the same exact world vision that gave us that nazi-fascism that so thoroughly embraced antisemitism and so methodically acted on it.
Basically, peaceful protest (from what I’ve heard in Italian media, defined as anything that disrupts the regular activities in the prison) is now a felony punishable with incarceration (not penalty cell time, mind you, actual additional years in prison).
This not only applies to actual inmates (whether found guilty or awaiting trial) but also irregular migrants detained in what are called “identification and expulsion centers” (CIE) but are basically just much worse prisons than regular ones.
Note that Italy’s prisons (both the “real” ones and CIEs) are quite overcrowded (prisons have 120% occupation on average with peaks of 190% - I don’t have data about CIEs but it’s a known fact they are often overcrowded).
Prison overcrowding is sadly a historical problem in Italy, but it’s gotten worse under Meloni’s government (especially when it comes to minors), as they have instituted several new kinds of felonies and aggravating circumstances, without any new investment in prisons.
Agreed (with the substance, if not the tone).
Using “meat attack” to refer to Russian military doctrine (as described by Russian deserters - the Russian government would of course deny that) is not more dehumanizing than using “slavery” to identify the condition of people being owned as property: ie. the practice is certainly dehumanizing, but calling it with its proper name (or whatever derogatory name) is not.
Mods please review your decision.
Ironic that it works (I presume) via an app
Err… the term Palestine (or “Palestinian territories”, if one swings that way) is appropriate when one wants to reference the Gaza Strip and West Bank together.
The (shocking and extremely worrying) levels of violence and illegal actions from Israel in the West Bank is incomparable with the mass killings the IDF is perpetrating in the Gaza strip (also, I’ve not heard the term “war” used to describe the situation in the West Bank), hence my specific reference to the Gaza strip.
Trying to say even very sensible things about the Middle east without triggering anyone is sure extenuating… I really respect the (so far fruitless) efforts of those diplomats who have been trying their hardest to get people to make sense of the whole mess of reach some (any!) sensible agreement.
Accused of slander? Netanyahu? I can’t believe it! He seemed like a such a good person… /s
BTW: We should really stop referring to what’s happening in the Gaza strip (and elsewhere) as “war”.
I went through my answers (and questions) and poisoned them little by little every day with errors
You are an evil genius (also, a very determined one - I wouldn’t have had the patience).
You are the first person i came across referring to them as “Middle East religions”.
Fair enough :) I’ll take that as an apology for having labeled me as racists for no reason.
For future reference, you might also hear “desert religions” (yeah, it’s not like all the deserts in the world are there) or “the three monotheist religions” (yeah, I know those are not the only ones): it means the same thing.
Then again what became of Christian in various places of the world has little to do with the region.
Yeah but the view on prostitution is shared (by and large) in the three religions we are talking about: it’s not a Christian-only thing and it’s not something that developed in Europe alone (well, as far as I know: we are still commenting on what I referred to as an assumption - ie. I’m not 100% sure about this).
Or do you consider modern beer to be Iraqi?
I could certainly say “IDK where beer comes from, I assume it’s from Mesopotamia?” though?
I’ll leave it to you to re-read what I wrote originally and find the flaw if this last comment of yours.
In reality, I guess I just made you angry… I’m Sorry about that, but “racist” is one of the very few things I don’t allow people to call me, so I took off my gloves.
seems racist
Wow. Please define “racist” for me, and show how it has anything to do with religion.
How the heck do you get the idea that Swedish sexual morals would be defined by people thousands of kilometres away?
Ok, you’ve just misunderstood me (no, this time it really wasn’t me being unclear, sorry).
The “middle east religions” are Judaism, Christianity and Islam (I listed them in chronological order, please don’t be triggered again). Is the expression not in use where you live? Even so, how the hell did you think I could mean Islam? Why would I do it in such a roundabout way and using plural?
IDK where this fixation in regulating other people’s sexual life comes from, I assume it’s from the Middle-east religions?
When asked the question “who is the victim in this supposed crime?” they will tell you it’s the exploited women (is there male prostitution? IDK), but those are supposed victims (even if 99.99% of prostitutes were forced into it, you’d still have to prove exploitation in each specific case - that’s how justice works in every other matter except this one). They won’t be able to explain (if not with, often made-up, statistical arguments) why they don’t treat women (and men) that are exploited in different businesses the same way (think, migrants forced to work in slavelike conditions in agriculture).
The sad truth is, those moralists are just more interested in dictating other people’s sexual behaviour than they are interested in human rights.
It’s worth mentioning that, besides the various semi-bans on prostitution (which do irritate me, but whom - in all honesty - I can live with), this unhealthy sexual fixation of our societies is what gifts us the marginalization (when it’s not persecution) of LGBT people.
Does that mean 15% both ways?
edit: apprently, it’s 15% US tariff and no changes on the EU side