I’d say running up against a 16bit number for a database import in 2025 is a little cursed. MS is special, still has a 260 path character limit (albiet soft now) in Windows.
Also with more phones taking an image and a video that is only 32767 snaps, which is probably a regular headache for initial imports.
It doesn’t seem to be, they look like different cables, look at the strain relief after the clear part, looks like a different pattern and shorter. They are probably both fully seated.
Yes, or the systems etc. Or the port is disabled if the switch has the ability.
‘Type disco into console for lights’ for CS
What is something something “*******”
Thats great! Overly simplistic explanation, the container is in its own little network and when you connect wireguard inside the container it is punching a hole out to where the wireguard server is located. Without knowing your setup its difficult, but that is probably why your ping is acting as it does. The container doesn’t know how to get to where you’re attempting to ping.
The allowed ips is a list, off the top of my head it accepts single IPs and cidr blocks. 0.0.0.0/0 is the cidr block that essentially means all ipv4 IPs, ::/0 is the same for ipv6. So to answer directly, the , is an or, its for any IP in the list.
Does your wireguard config have ipv6 addresses? If your not using them you can safely remove them.
For example Change
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0
To
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0
Also could try adding net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in the sysctls section
Multiple edits: I’m terrible with formatting while not on a phone.
More edits: just found out i can expand errors and the compose. Looks like it is the AllowedIPs line in peer1.conf. Just removing , ::/0 as above “should” solve it
Always mullvad for privacy, top tier. Only know you as a number and you can pay physical cash whole os (iirc) & vpn server runs in RAM and is gone on powerloss, the best.
Unless you are trying to get around geo blocks as they publish all their servers, so it’s easier for them to get blocked https://mullvad.net/en/servers.
Or if you are using it constantly, then just go with whoever is cheapest/has the features you like as you are only hiding from your ISP, everyone else still knows.
Shortanswer as I’m on a phone No. The 80 will also work in most devices (laptops and phones) without needing an amp.
If you have some spare cash you can look at IODD or Zalman (white label iodd) devices. USB disk drives that also emulate an optical disk drive and mount ISOs.
I bought a Zalman back over a decade ago, still have and use it to this day. Used the daily in at data centres. Bees knees. Looking at the IODD devices now for the USBC port, but the Zalman is still working flawlessly.
I am away on vacation and may not check back regularly, sorry in advance.
Is this only on LiveUSB? Have you installed to the SSD with acpi on and checked if it boots correctly?
If it is just the liveUSB it sounds like when you have acpi on it power cycles/changes the driver or something with the usb ports and causes the live USB to disappear while trying to boot from it.
Are you also booting UEFI or Legacy? That can change some of the answers.
TL;DR: Linux No, Android Yes
The desktop linux binary is currently only x86__64. But work is being done https://github.com/futo-org/Grayjay.Desktop/issues/83
Lineage should be able to install the android version for armv8.
I haven’t done any of this, just from what I’ve read. YMMV