

Dev on one of the most highly used simple tools finds project is secure. News at 11. They really would have to try hard to find a worse example.


Dev on one of the most highly used simple tools finds project is secure. News at 11. They really would have to try hard to find a worse example.


It’s a day old account 🤣🤷♂️


Microsoft MAI-DxO is currently winning in our metrics but not widely available. At this point in time it is the obvious winner although not in GA. DxGPT second followed by path AI and AI doc. All these have completed FDA requirements, been studied, and enjoyed a success rate near our better then doctors when used parallel in diagnosis.
Ahhh the, everyone I disagree with is a Nazi or bot. Solid.
Say the line Bart!
“Everyone I didn’t agree with is a bot”
Maybe people are using it 🤷♂️
Will those are the idiots who were already lazy and going to kill you 🤷♂️
There is proper tooling, and they should be learning to use it.
I absolutely love that you all think that there are only these models designed to make you like the product. It’s like watching Republicans scream to the world how ignorant you are. Everything is a chatbot to you all 😂
I’m pretty sure I’d care if thought you could read. I addressed your question.
Well I’m sure free chatgpt is the best we can do 😂
Yes. All the time.
Yup. Account age is an utterly pointless and a shitty evaluation tool. Unless you’re just looking to attach a person rather than the idea 🤷♂️. Just creates little shitty echo chambers to attach yourself to.
And fedverse makes it literally impossible to stop. Tech bros really not thinking through how people think, act, and build trust.
Did it feel good reporting me? Do you feel effective?
You can only get banned for an opinion so much before moving on to the next one 🤷♂️.
Imagine believing that they’ll use general purpose free chatgpt. Just amazing these scenarios you all invent. I can’t tell if it’s just straight blind prejudice or you all really don’t understand how it can integrate into tooling with very specific models.
Just wild what people have cooked up in their mental model.
Riiiiiiiiiight, LLMs don’t cite sources and the portals written in the 90s for journals solve all of that.
It’s so amazing to watch you all invent these crazy scenarios, where you’ve chosen the absolute lowest bar you can find. As if some layman who has no clue how to use this tool is working on some free Claude account because you read about one shitty doctor or lawyer fucking up. It’s honestly sad seeing these hoops to jump through.
Professional tools, run by some of the most educated type a professionals in the planet minimize and reduce these risks by providing defaults and interfaces along with education.
FFS they can (and will) kill you accidentally with far more simple shit that can’t be mostly mitigated away. But yeah, because LLMs can be used poorly by morons it’s worthless 🙄.
Which is why your doctor should use it as a tool and validate the results. You know, do their job.
Y’all are just fucking binary. How do you think medical and community members work now? They use a shitty search engine or portal to look up material, and yes, some of it will be garbage they need to wade through.
But God forbid they have a tool that puts that information into a cited overview to supplement a tricky diagnosis. The prejudice and fake workflows that y’all invent is crazy. Looking for little edge cases everywhere catching the AI in a mistake
Y’all will screech but having a giant ass search engine that is able to process patient data in context is incredibly useful.
Y’all are just prejudice. Professionals will be using these tools and they already have been providing excellent real world results. Honestly, if you don’t understand how the medical community is using AI/ml with real validated results, you should be keeping your mouth shut on the topic.
What the actual fuck? Nos lasts like a minute, 2 minutes tops when not hooked up to a machine.
Do these people have a fucking bottle and mask?