You could do a tricolor of black, green and white and have a shield and lock/key in the style of the communist flag.

Then you have five symbols:

. Freedom/ independence (darkblue)

. Peace/ harmony (white and dove)

. Active defence (shield)

. Security (lock)

. Privacy/ unseenedness (black)

I personally associate freedom with white because its like a piece of unpainted paper. I associate peace with green because it is the color of plants which symbolizes nature.

If I understand security, it is a contrast to the active defence in that it is passive defence. If so, you could possibly play around with how these symbolically relate to each other. For deem looking at them as a two sided unity.

You are a dreamer, and this is exactly what we need. Two hands up for that.

But before designing a flag, we first need to agree on the symbolism.

There are two types of symbols. Anti symbols and pro symbols.

Anti symbols are easier to make, because they comes from reaction. Its easy to see whats wrong. “anarchism is order” and “stop war” stickers are anti symbols.

But pro symbols are harder because they require us to understand what we are fighting for. The rainbow flag and the aboriginal flag are pro flags, because they show what they are fighting for. The rainbow flag fights for diversity, while the aboriginal flag establishes a connection between people, land and the sun.

In short, I believe that a pro symbol would be better for gleedening people into the struggle.

With this in mind, I think we should fundamenrally understand why privacy matters, and make symbols out of that.

I love the puzzle game lumines. Would be delightful to see a commons version of it <3

I tried this, but it didn’t work either.

I’m trying to test the software out on localhost, but I get this message. Are there bugs, or am I setting it up with wrong ip/port/anything?

Seems like the webpage is down right now.

Markworthy! I love gemini. Im testing it out.

Very enlightening!

Cryptocurrencies are a waste of resources and gives might to those with computing force, that is the mighty.

There is no reason to inbosom it.

Let’s rather effort towards moneyless societies.

All Cryptocurrencies Are Bad

Yes, that’s a trap. When you make the thing you love into a job. You blur the lines of whether it still is meaningful or something you do because you love it. You are no longer guided the meaningful, but whether your bloodgivers finds it valuable. In smaller and larger ways your path is steered away from the meaningful.

Superiority complex in the comments.

Tech is made to make us feel stupid, so you are not alone in feeling that.

If the symbolism doesnt matter that much to you, you could use the letter “v” as the icon.

Here I found a black on white drawing of a handsign for the letter v under Creative Commons by Erik Bolstad, Store Norske Leksikon.

Imperialist outlet Independent privacy washing surveillance messager Meta Whatsapp. They are platforming might - that is Meta Whatsapp spokesperson - instead of privacy focused organizations such as Electronic Frontier Foundation. Painting Iran as paranoid after litterally being attacked by zioni supremacist ruledom.

Now let’s be clear. Morality police is bad. Women Life Freedom. They are suppressing humanity. But this work is made to embolden Israel and western might.

Side with folks instead. We need to enblossom the folks at ground so that they can become independent of might.

Why are we promoting trash?

Dismantle all walldoms!

I’ll say that I do believe in what you point to as [linguist purity], BUT I also think that this framing is a misnomer that ought to be relighted. Towards weightening how we are better able to think around images and craft our own words. Towards speaking from our soul, towards seeing the souls of others. I’ll instead relight to the term blossomframe to weighten this birth.

It’s like how poets are cooking forth delightful images that we thouroghly understands through meltable words. Its not that poets use less latin because they feel like english is above, but rather because english speakers are better able to fully melt english than latin.

Or how using less loanwords when talking with children makes them more easily understand. Why would we not want our words to be this meltful in all manners of speech? Why cant we make the wholeness of the english tongue become plain english?

When english is a blend of many different tongues, we have to fathom the rules of each of them in order to understand and craft words. Latin, french, greek and english. This in turn also makes us spend a lot more time when trying to understand a word or crafting a word.

By using the blossomframe, it would turn anarchist writings much more fathomful. It would make it easier to question framings. Our learning would shift our awareness away from the wordbook and academia towards crafting framings that resonates with our soul. It would shift forces of tongue away from academia, capitalists and might towards the folk. Making the words of the commoners have more weight than that of might.

To inbosom the blossomframe is to enblossom all folks with these forces of change?

The blossomframe is the grounds for unweightening might. It is the grounds for the blossoming of mankind.

Wordbook

• relight :: To use another word or another framing.
• tongue :: The forthgang we use to speak with one another.
• leeth :: Written words that speaks to our feelings.
• leether :: One who makes leeths.
• birth :: Traits that comes just because of what it is.

Since NewPipe doesnt use all the features of peertube. For deem, it doesnt let you comment on videos nor upload videos.