Sounds like time to run either a food grow op or Folding@Home on a schedule to create false alarms

You were the target of LeanBeefPatty’s psyop, and it worked.

Per gigawatt-year.

That wouldn’t change anything in this specific case, since you can’t buy the whole anymore either.

How would you even start to enforce those laws against a company that no longer exists? It’s one thing to prevent the AI companies from selling a product that relies on continual support in the first place, but these earbuds will work until the batteries degrade (and theoretically longer if you can manage to replace them without destroying the things) with or without the company’s existence. The fact that the user lost the case with no company to replace it doesn’t seem to me to be the kind of thing that you can really address legally, unless you make the companies put a certain stock of parts in escrow or something, which seems potentially far more wasteful than the status quo.

This is because “vegetable” is purely a culinary term. There’s no botanical definition of a vegetable. Tomatoes are berries, which is a type of fruit, from a botanical standpoint. So are cucumbers. They’re both vegetables from a culinary standpoint. Lettuce is a leaf. Broccoli is a flower. Carrots are roots. Celery is a stalk. All vegetables culinarily.

Looks like a graduated cylinder to me on the first one. Second is an odd angle, maybe a selfie stick?

Ending capitalism isn’t the only step to ending warz but it’s definitely a necessary one.

Could be Portland.

I’ll ponder it, but only from a safe distance. It’s important to make sure that the orb doesn’t ponder you back.

Hard-R gamers

Meh, it’s 0K.

I think that image is of the Equinox, which was mentioned in the article. The 2027 Bolt hasn’t started production.

I certainly can’t pay $30k, but for a new EV, that’s pretty damn good.

LinkedIn ass title

I think keeps might be a better verb.

Wait, they took one of our sapiens? The bastards!

Wrong documentation is still a pretty big problem, even without the gaslighting. Incomplete documentation is better than none; incorrect documentation is not.

I guarantee it’s already happened. The question is when a company large enough that you can’t avoid it follows suit.

Because dating apps need lots of users, so they kind of have to be free, but they also cycle through users quickly if they work well. This makes it hard to turn a profit. Capitalism then makes sure that they either cease to exist or get enshittified.

No one is questioning why addicted people keep smoking. We’re questioning why non-addicted people start smoking.