Thanks for pointing this out, that’s better than what I could’ve said to explain it. The DM can always make changes without adhering to any limitations, but if they are a good DM, they’ll at least try to be consistent. And that’s the least I expect from professional writers. (And I similarly expect them to wait for the actual rules of the system to be published before writing an adventure.)
I love this gem. The only thing they got a but wrong is that bardic inspiration could actually be whispered, since it only requires the target to be able to hear you.
It is in this regard. It might be poorly balanced, but there are rules for things like the sound a spell makes or the specific spells available to NPCs. There are a lot more rigid systems, but DnD definetly isn’t on the casual side either.
I feel you. I’m currently planning to run it someday and there are just so many things I’ll definetly change.
Glad someone else knows it. As a player who frequently had to transcribe spells into roll20, I always just assume other people know the components certain spells take to cast and then end up confused if they don’t.
Yes they could. But they did not. That’s what I’m crititicising. Perception is one of the most used skills ever. It would not have hurt not to use it here. And if you really want to, then give her some kind of ability that actually let’s her do that, because these kind of things can be missleading to new players/DMs and puts extra work on the DM.
And I really like less strict systems like M&M too, but if you write something in a more rigid system, you should adhere to the rules of that system. Or in this case: You shouldn’t start writing full on adventures in an unfinished system.
Some do. I know I do. It limits what casters can do at least a little.
Because it would make subtle-spell kind of redundant and why even use components in the first place if they cannot be used to tell you are casting something?
They are using an official statblock which lacks this ability. The only way the shaman can have it is if the DM added it themself. And since this is a prewrittem module, it really shouldn’t have such oversights, especially since newer, inexperienced DM‘s likely aren’t familiar enough with the rules to know this, which makes it at least decently likely that they’ll just assume everyone can cast stealthily.
Funnily enough, intellect devourers can actually mimic the target they are inhabiting quite convincingly, thanks to inheriting their memories. I once had an Alhoon in a campaign who made use of that fact. The players never found out, but its really terrifying to think about.
You are aware someone else already posted this several days prior? I know you’re uploading a lot of memes, but at least check whether something was already published here.
My group once was three guys and three girls. Now it’s two and a half guys, two girls and one person without any gender. I am the only one who changed nothing.
Oh. Yeah. That just screams Darwin Award.
Nice. Thanks.
I did a wikipedia search a few days ago and it says you can just insert all sexualities you want. So you could just use heterosexuality, right?
If we were still on Reddit, I would link r/explainthejoke. What is this about?
Out of couriosity: I have never played the game, so… is the game actually unplayable if you decide to be intolerant against one or more of these? (As in: Is the tolerance and representation part of the core mechanics or is this just meant as a statement?)
Even though I do not have a problem with treating the things mentioned with respect, something about this text irritates me, but I can’t put my finger on it. Which feels really weird because I don’t like the feeling of something being off even though I can’t spot anything that actually bothers me.
I can now confidently say that I am a Veteran because I have no idea how the players should’ve known to just start murdering people.
“Should jail sentence time be based on race?” will allways be one of my favourite posts ever.