As a Christian, who has actually read the Bible, I think the venomous bigotry actually self-selects them out of Christianity. “They’ll know you are Christians by your love for others” was maybe Jesus’ clearest definition of what it meant to follow him.
This may be similar to “actual libertarianism,” but I wouldn’t know, not being a libertarian.
Anti-consumer for the sake of the bottom line is to be expected, but they’re burning millions of dollars on this.
We briefly homeschooled during the pandemic, and like you we’re non-conservative Christians. When our Christian friends asked about our curriculum, they always wrinkled their noses at the fact that it said “secular curriculum” on the cover. We told them, “you don’t understand how weird the home school curriculum business is. Trust me, it’s way easier to take this curriculum and add the values we want to impart than to take all the Christian nationalism out of the religious curriculum.”
Across the board, in product survey after product survey, consumers agree with you every time about thin phones. At best nobody cares beyond being briefly conceptually impressed (in a way that doesn’t translate into sales), at worst people actively hate how fragile it looks (or actually is). They always would rather have more battery life than a thinner phone, and actually below a certain weight most consumers prefer a phone to be heavier.
So why do companies keep racing to make the thinnest phones?
I honestly have no idea. This isn’t one of those things where I pose a rhetorical question and then answer it. The planned obsolescence of the battery seems plausible, but a thinner battery doesn’t really correspond to a shorter lifespan, just a shorter duty cycle. Maybe it’s just a vanity thing, like a competition between companies, but the bean-counters don’t usually let that sort of thing keep going if it doesn’t sell. Maybe it’s marketing, but that never really succeeds either. I really don’t know.
There’s plenty of haggis to go around.
They love trying to decode it, but I haven’t seen any evidence that they use anything less subtle than a full-throated shout at the top of their lungs to tell everyone what they think.
Ah, well, Fox thought it was very important to frame it as a “Dems in DISARRAY!” story, so I guess that makes sense. But nobody there has talked to an actual Democrat since the Kennedy administration, let alone an actual leftist, so you can pretty safely ignore their caricature.
It’s not explicitly a painting of the Trail of Tears, but it was painted about 40 years after that dark chapter of our history, and it features White Americans chasing Native Americans into the darkness, so it’s hard to imagine that anyone who likes the painting isn’t at least okay with the Indian Removal Act. Best case scenario, they don’t know their history. Worst case scenario (I think there’s pretty good evidence that we’re here), they want to do it again.
Eh, I think the actual stuff they’re really doing is enough evidence without needing to make up stuff.
Yeah…sometimes I think we should just tear it all down.
This is such a great observation.
In thinking about it I think it kind of works backwards for them, too: they hear that we do care about something, and then they decide that they have to aggressively not care about it, or care in the opposite direction. Like the whole paper straw thing; nobody on the left really cared about it, but there were some conservatives who really thought they were ownin’ the libs by using plastic straws.
You remember it incorrectly. The most pro-Hunter Biden thing I ever heard was the first word of “If it’s true…”
Everyone I ever heard speak on the matter said that any case they could make should go to trial, and that Biden shouldn’t have pardoned him.
I only have the most pedestrian understanding of the IPA from a single class in college (which was a long time ago), so I’ll admit I just grabbed the IPA off of Wiktionary for “fruit,” “vegetable,” and “fudge” to bridge between the two. It looks good enough to my eyes to be at least reasonable.
Ah, once again, nature refuses to be easily categorized! Thanks.
The culinary classifications have no scientific basis, but they do have an anthropological basis. They’re not completely meaningless.
Who is “we”?
I was basing that on a misunderstanding: I thought that the word “vegetation” being an archaic term meant that it was no longer used, but yeah, I was incorrect there. I appreciate the correction.
I am actually…kind of just like this at parties. So, you be the judge.
Excellent to hear. That’s what I was hoping for!
I’m so glad that this problem isn’t just limited to English.
Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it.
A properly grown tomato absolutely can be so flavorful, sweet, tangy, varied, complex… that you could just eat it like an apple.
I am sad to say that, although I’ve heard of this, I have never had the pleasure of eating such a tomato.
Finally, to throw more insanity on this terminology dumpster fire…
Corn.
As a native son of Indiana, I have to say that’s the thing that breaks pretty much all of my categories. I lived the first twenty years of my life thinking that it qualified nutritionally (ugh, that’s another part of this terminology dumpster fire…the food pyramid. shudder) as a vegetable, which it…doesn’t really.
So… ketchup… is then roughly a tomato/corn smoothie, made primarily from two… frui-getables.
Great point. “Tomato smoothie” is already a term that makes me feel a little bit queasy, but adding in the corn…
Fruigetable.
Beautiful. fɹud͡ʒ.tə.bəl, I think, incidentally.
Substack is an email newsletter platform that supports paid subscriptions. They were exposed a few years ago as allowing Nazis to host their newsletters and make money on their platform; when this became public, the people in charge at Substack said they would not stop allowing Nazis to use the platform, including to be paid for making Nazi content.
This week, they sent out push notifications that actively recommended Nazi content to users.