ok. you could just ask me if i was speaking literally or not.

like. come on. be charitable.

chaco taco

productive response. ty for your contribution.

jfc fuck off. are you serious?

i’m not joking ?

if i’m wrong please call me out. but i still feel like i’m right.

I know it’s nobody’s fault but my own that I’m disgusting trash. I know it’s unreasonable and unrealistic to expect anyone to like me

stopped reading here.

just care about your hygiene and fitness. stop hating yourself. nothing else matters.

the wildest part of this is that the libreoffice dev still uses hotmail

like honestly, microsoft doing him a solid by getting him off it

since 2023ish i regularly go to my neighborhood library to get work done / read. it honestly rules and i wish i thought of it a lot, lot sooner.

can’t justify coffee shops with prices as is and i’ll just pack my own for the library

lol as if my AI girlfriend can get pregnant

so it kinda sounds like you’re doing a ‘Hillary got more votes’ here

no it doesn’t. you’re only now saying that because you don’t know the history re: Gawker’s take down but decided to comment on it

No, just don’t be an idiot. When you attack someone expect a response.

it’s idiotic to attack billionaires… so we have to play nice with them in order to survive?

you just really argued that fucking annoying point twice? and here i thought i was being irrationally condescending.

you can still put “no jews” tho

ffs

edit: the article is wrong about who owns Grindr. sold to Beijing Tech group in from 2016-2018, but the USA forced them to sell it back to the USA in 2020. it’s now owned by a US investment group.

If they had simply obeyed the court order to take down the non-consensual sex tape they would still exist

Gawker appealed the take down order and won.

If they hadn’t made an enemy of Thiel by outing his sexuality against his consent they would still exist

oh so we have to play nice with literal demons in order to exist?

I’m being condescending and I apologize I just really really do not like this argument you’re making

even just ignoring how much of a tech-fascist Thiel is, one doesn’t get to fund/support homophobic politicians/causes while being closeted. one doesn’t get the safety of privacy while hurting people. sorry not sorry.

vtubers are… they are not for me. but holy shit this is wild. all support to this girl and others fucked by this shitass vshojo corporation

it’s almost like leftists who scream annoyingly (me) about wage theft + fucking corporations are right or osmething

edit: looked at a few more things. god damn the people in charge @ VShojo are so fucked (good, fucking good). wiretap fraud, embezzlement, whatever the legal term for stealing from nonprofits is… this is going to go beyond civil lawsuits and be federal/california criminal felonies. rob bonta, california AG, is such an attn seeking nerd he’s going to be all over this

just sent this to my family just so they can know. my mom is still pretty coherent but sometime i worry, less about this but more other scams that i regularly warn her about.

this shit is wild.

yep, exactly

granted they all voted no in the end, but why did AOC play games on the MTG amendment just to vote no on everything?

?

she voted no on the full munitions bill, which included the iron dome “defenses”

honestly i’m having trouble having serious conversations with people about this because they refuse to recognize or grapple with the fact that she voted no on the full munitions bill, which included the iron dome “defenses”

the only thing that makes sense to me is that she’s playing politics and doesn’t want MTG’s amendment to be used against her - which is strange given that she ultimately voted no on the entire munitions bill

Coming under fire from the left for the glaring contradiction of providing military assistance to a state that is perpetrating an active genocide

she voted no on the full munitions bill, which included the iron dome “defenses”

She’s openly admitting she supports sending weapons to Israel so Israel can continue to commit genocide

she voted no on the full bill which included that

okay… so why not vote for the amendment to cut off Iron Dome? or is her “worry” that with Iron Dome cut off in the bill, more of the House will vote to continue the bill which still includes munitions flow - to which she is against?

i’m being very charitable to her, but that seems to be what she’s arguing?

edit: she voted no on the full bill. a lot of people are being very bad-faith in this thread.