Hmmm, obviously there no possible way that was, you know, specifically to demonstrate my point… Nah!

But, did you read the last paragraph even? Like, what’s solidarity and avoiding unnecessary divisive rhetoric for to do with blame, anyway?

Seriously, though, if we all didn’t start channeling the rage at the people who are actually destroying things, what’s even the point??

You got a counter argument, or are you just gonna pout?

I’ll never understand the whole assigning blame routine. Blame isn’t a solution. It doesn’t fix a damn thing to know whose fault it is. If you want to solve the problem, figuring out who to blame is nothing but a waste of time and energy.

That said, you’re wrong. There’s plenty of people and organizations to blame, from Rupert Murdock to the Heritage Foundation and beyond. Did refusing to vote for Harris help? Of course not. But this didn’t fucking start with “enlightened liberals” (which is a complete useless term, btw; why the fuck is everyone got such a hard-on for calling people liberals, anyway?).

Besides, all your doing here is playing into the divisive rhetoric. Our only chance is solidarity amongst the working class, and this bullshit ain’t helping. Well, no, I guess if I’m going to be honest here it does help the sociopathic oligarchs maintain control. So congratulations - you’re fighting for the wrong fucking side.

Now, in theory at least, do they even have the authority/jurisdiction/whatever to execute a state warrant, let alone “civil warrant”?

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think they’ll respect the law. Just curious if anybody here has info…

How about a frag grenade ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah, this poll sounds sus as hell. Just some crap they whipped up to counter the fact that more reputable polls have been giving Trump pretty shit numbers for months now. So they had to come up with something to shape the narrative the in the other direction.

What green energy source??? There’s no green energy involved, and unnecessary contamination of a water source.

Lol.

Proud of ourselves, are we?

Weirdo

Well, yeah - there isn’t one.

Like, duh?

Do you have to pay rent to think about something?

That sounds expensive. Unless, of course, you’re more comfortable not holding into any thought. 🤣

I’ve been starting to wonder just how much this shit “phones home”. Because, obviously, this technology can be used to increase the capabilities of corporate surveillance.

Heh. Yes they’re similar, but on the technical side different in a very important way. It has to do with opening a file from inside another program. If you select a shortcut, the program with treat or as a separate file, so most of the time the action will fail. A link, though, you should end up with the program opening the target of the link. In other words, a shortcut is a file that points at a different file, where a symlink involves she filesystem trickery to accomplish almost the same thing.

That’s a horrible, just terrible explanation, though - but I’m pretty sure this is the gist of it.

So, because old laws haven’t been struck from the books, you are telling me hitting regulations (something entirely different) is justified?

Ridiculous

Ah, I may have misunderstood the intent behind some of your wording, my bad.

The whole issue does make me hope open standards continue to gain more adoption. One can hope, right?

Anyway, again, my apologies - it does sound like we’re kinda on the same page here after all.

Whoah, no need to get defensive! That was just a guess based on my own observations, and I never said anything about whether they have the right to do whatever the hell they want with their own chips (which would be true regardless, I reckon).

That said, given that their business model depends on their walled garden approach, I just find myself wondering if they might’ve seen the possibility of running any old ARM executable on their silicon as a potential threat to their business model? But there’s all sorts of factors in play, so maybe I’m wrong and that whole possibility is irrelevant.

Do you happen to know if they strictly extended existing APIs?

Umm …was that onion tasty?

Yup. If I remember correctly, the percentage of bots immediately increased, though, but I could be wrong.

I think I played that one, but I think it was ported to the Apple // by the time I played it.

That will only work if executables compiled with ARM as the target can run on Apple silicon. My understanding was that even though they used ARM as the basis they made significant changes to the instruction set, which would require being able to compile targeting the M1/M2 chips.

I’m not 100%, but I suspect this will be a problem…

deleted by creator