Sounds like a coup might be incoming.

The only person who said 3 days was some random US general, why are y’all using it as some sort of gotcha?

WaPo just publishes Bezos’s marketing emails.

lol you didn’t even bother clicking the link did you?

VOA is part of the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), the government agency that oversees all non-military, U.S. international broadcasting. It is funded by the U.S. Congress.

Type: Statutory corporation with a royal charter

A statutory corporation is a government entity created as a statutory body by statute.

It doesn’t matter what language you try to couch it in, “state funded”, “editorial independence”, whatever. It was founded by the state, is funded by the state, and is a government entity. If it quacks like a duck.

mediabiasfactcheck, the site that squashes two complex spectrums (left vs right, unbiased vs biased) into a one dimensional line, making no distinction between centrism and being unbiased.

and reliable reporting as you can get outside the BBC

“Russian state owned media bad. British state owned media good.”

I guess you’re just assuming it’s bad based on its name

No, we know it’s bad because it’s literally run by the US government.

You probably weren’t even alive under communism. Or if you were you were a child.

Putin isn’t a Nazi, Prigozhen is.

And even if it was Nazi vs Nazi, you shouldn’t be rooting for either side.

Why are you rooting for the Nazi private military?

You can’t just declare a megathread.

But we have no idea what troops those are. Also they’re pointing their guns at nothing, like they’re trying to look like they’re doing something when they really aren’t.

Can we please not have a default avatar? I specifically want no avatar.

if you change tab with then your space alignment breaks

No, it doesn’t? Here’s the exact same text content with different tab widths:

The tabs are smaller but the spaces are the same, so the alignment remains.

I said fuck off.

God this is such bad faith bullshit. Fuck off.

what you may assume and words you put in my mouth do not constitute any argument I’ve made

Then please explain what the following means, because it isn’t proper grammar and you just called my best attempt at interpreting it “words I put in your mouth”.

in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

How about you respond to the part where I respond to what’s left of your comment?

in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

This part is malformed, I’m not even entirely sure what it’s supposed to say. I’ll assume this:

in a context where the two (left and right) are the only political biases being discussed

So you’re saying that the site just doesn’t consider centrist bias at all but only looks at left and right? Why is that? Centrist bias a form of bias too, isn’t it? Why don’t they consider centrist bias?

no, it’s just a rebuttal to an unproven and slanderous accusation.

It’s unprovable, which you know damn well. I know what I saw in your comment though and you telling me otherwise is gaslighting.

you’re welcome to try to prove any wrongdoing on my part, and I’ll point to the fact that many of your comments are edited as well.

Legit fucking gaslighting. You know damn well there isn’t an edit history. But I replied to the part you removed with:

What, political bias vs political alignment?

My edits have not removed anything like yours have.

lmao you went back and edited your comment to remove the part I replied to (political bias vs political alignment).

I see nothing left in your comment that explains how that’s not what the spectrum illustrates. Here’s what you haven’t removed so far:

all that you’ve proven is that it is, in fact, you who cannot distinguish centrism from being unbiased because you conflate the center of a bias spectrum with political centrism in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed and you’e trying to inject political alignment as a Straw man

in a context where the two are only political bias is being discussed

This part is malformed, I’m not even entirely sure what it’s supposed to say. I’ll assume this:

in a context where the two (left and right) are the only political biases being discussed

So you’re saying that the site just doesn’t consider centrist bias at all but only looks at left and right? Why is that? Centrist bias a form of bias too, isn’t it? Why don’t they consider centrist bias?