Devil’s advocate: if the problems were could be solved with relatively simple programming, why aren’t why they solved already?
Devil’s advocate: if the problems were could be solved with relatively simple programming, why aren’t why they solved already?
But is it friendly to users? The future is now.
I first tried Ubuntu then switched to pop os and haven’t looked back. Feels great to be free of MS.
Providing good buses might just be a great advertising campaign.
Yeah that’s a great point – the dataframe is in a sense a class or object standardized for data analysis. Its flexibility (like being able to store arrays or dicts even) obviates the need in most cases for a user-written class.
For me it depends on the use case. If I’m designing something with an interface for someone downstream to use, I’ll usually define (data)classes even if I have a functional interface.
For data science/modeling/notebooks I usually wouldn’t define classes.
I think it also depends on your team; if everyone else is a functional programmer and you’re writing classes or vice versa, this will undoubtedly create frictions.
I’m curious, if you were emperor for a day, you would like to see Switzerland do?
Funny how I never see articles on Lemmy about improvements in LLM capabilities.
The ad writes itself: NO ONEDRIVE.
Yep, happened with my wife’s laptop. Fortunately you just follow the instructions and we had a second laptop but I was still sweating bullets.