• 4 Posts
  • 1.21K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2024

help-circle





  • Voting patters. screw up relations between votes and comments. Buch of votes coming in at particular points in time. Comments that were being upvoted for hours suddenly getting 30 downvotes at once. It’s pretty obvious.

    I’ve been on the lookout as it’s not the first time this happen with anti-AI gang. I have been suspicious about bot usage by some user on this topics for some time. So I’ve been comparing post where people talk about AI and other posts and the voting patterns are all different.

    This could as well be just old classic brigading. But with brigading you usually get more one line comments, when it’s just the votes it’s usually bots.








  • That’s your opinion. I disagree with it. Keep the banner as it is. Someone surely took the time to make that image. As it’s pretty good even more for the time it was created. You are just dishing that person’s work. I respect that person work, so the banner should stay.

    It would be fine if it was possible to ask the person who made the banner how did they made it and how long it took.

    Your complain seems to be mostly based on AI being able to do things faster. At that point why stop there… don’t hire digital artist. They took jobs away from traditional artists. Pretty sure the only good thing we could do I commission the banner to a full crew of sculptors to do the 3d mesh on granite and then a full tome oil painter for a year to capture the image into canvas. That would make sure that not technological advances would steal anyone’s job.

    Edit: It’s fucking ironic that anti-AI people use downvote/ upvote bots. But I catched it. Fucking ironic.




  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzResources
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Last reply, after blocking your because your insult.

    Population control do not require any violent measure.

    It can be as simple as making people lives better, as it has been proven that populations with higher life quality have less children. Then achieving the objective of having a lesser global population .

    Discussion ends here as you have been blocked.





  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzResources
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Once again the survival of the species is not on the line because of that.

    That’s just an excuse you are making to justify a hate that has other roots.

    Prove is in the complete disregard of proposed solutions: remote work, decentralized offices, traffic reduction instead of complete suppression, population reduction… And apparently disregard for other forms of pollution that could be reduced or eliminated instead, for instance, international traveling, or traveling at all, maybe people living in cities should never visit nature or different places, that travel will destroy the world!