

Thanks! So far there is only this page describing what can be listed and an email https://euvetted.com/request-listing But more decent submission form is on the roadmap
Software engineer/manager from Latvia. Interested in digital sovereignty and EU alternatives to big tech. Building solo projects, one of which is euvetted.com - a directory of European and privacy-first SaaS alternatives to major US tools, with hosting region, ownership and CLOUD Act data per listing. Affiliate-funded (probably will be in future)


Thanks! So far there is only this page describing what can be listed and an email https://euvetted.com/request-listing But more decent submission form is on the roadmap


If you mean this page https://euvetted.com/alternatives/hetzner than the first blue line means the product that we compare against, Hetzner in this case. In case if the base product is US the line is red like here https://euvetted.com/alternatives/aws
I’ve intentionally added alternative to X for some most obvious European products like Proton or Hetzner in this case.
Please let me know if either of these are confusing or do not make sense. Thanks!


Looks like that got cut off mid-sentence :) Did you mean the list of tools on the homepage something missing from it, or hard to find? Let me know what you were after.


Agreed and good timing, because that page already exists, it’s just not linked well. There’s a full write-up at /insights/cloud-act-exposure (why it matters, who’s exposed, the numbers across the directory) way more than the About page covers. The gap is exactly what you said: every “CLOUD Act” mention should point to it instead of assuming you’ll go find it. I’ll wire up the ⓘ link. Thanks.


Thank you!
Okay, now thats a bug in both code and the content. Huge thanks for pointing it out. As mentioned in my previous comment the website does have “alternative to X” for some of European products, but it should not display these amongst US tools. Will fix that asap