WoodScientist [she/her]

  • 0 Posts
  • 154 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 18th, 2025

help-circle










  • People can’t recognize the difference between capitalism and commerce. You don’t need to completely end private property and free enterprise in order to end capitalism. Hell, even the Soviet Union at times found keeping some small private businesses around made a lot of sense.

    I don’t want a world where people can’t work for themselves, provide services directly to others, etc. Every restaurant and bar doesn’t need to be run by a central planning committee. But giant conglomerates that control the employment of tens of thousands? Maybe that’s the kind of thing the private market shouldn’t be running. We can let people operate their own modest independent businesses without also letting Walmart exist. We can let people earn enough modest profit from the fruits of their labor to make starting new businesses worthwhile, without also allowing people to hoard such vast fortunes that they become geopolitically dangerous. We can have commerce without capitalism. I want a world where people can work for themselves without having to work for someone else or for the government. That doesn’t mean I want a world where you can become a billionaire by playing labor arbitrage with the hard work of thousands of other human beings. We can let people own their own homes without also allowing industrial-scale landlording.

    Commerce and capitalism are not the same thing. We can have commerce without capitalism. Commerce existed long, long before capitalism, and it will exist long after capitalism has been relegated to the history books.


  • I want to encourage more people to refer to this as what it is - the Hitlerian definition of anti-Semitism.

    Modern Hitlerian anti-Semites view being Jewish and being a Zionist as one and the same. A Jewish person can be born in the US, have complete loyalty to the US, and have absolutely zero interest in or loyalty to Israel. But according to the Hitlerian definition of anti-Semitism, Jewish people have innate loyalty to Israel from birth. They are inseparable. To be Jewish is to be Israeli. A Jewish person cannot really be a full citizen of the United States, Canada, Germany, or any other nation except Israel. They will always be the suspect foreign other.

    I use the word “Hitlerian” because that’s exactly what this logic is. The Nazis held that Jews could never truly be full citizens of Germany. Countless Jewish WW1 veterans, people who considered themselves fully German had zero loyalty to any other nation, were sent to camps on the theory that they could never truly be German. They would always be foreigners. They would always be the other. This was also the logic of the Japanese internment camps. Every Japanese person was suspect, simply due to their ethnic heritage. They could be the most stars-and-stripes wearing gung-ho America fan imaginable, it didn’t matter. Their preferences, beliefs, hopes, and dreams, none of it mattered. All that mattered was their ethnicity.

    Glastonbury is using the Hitlerian definition of anti-Semitism. They follow the Hitlerian belief that all Jews are intrinsically foreigners and owe innate loyalty to the state of Israel. And we can’t be afraid to call this logic Hitlerian, as that’s what it truly is.