• 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 18 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 15th, 2026

help-circle

  • Rushing regulatory for a construction project where failures are as severe as they can potentially be with nuclear is beyond deranged.

    Getting to the timelines you’re mentioning would require a mature nuclear industry with standardized builds, something which would take more than a decade to develop, at a steep premium.

    Again, I support any investor willing to go there to do so, but there’s a good reason none do - these things quite simply do not pencil out.


  • Allow existing nuclear to keep operating? Yes

    Allow new nuclear to be built, assuming the constructors fully finance and assume the risk of the project themselves? Also yes

    Subsidize nuclear over renewables? No

    Allow nuclear to be used as a wedge for the fossil fuel propaganda machine to keep their emissions going, since building nuclear takes decades and costs far more than renewables, displacing potential investment in renewables? Not a chance in hell

    I have nothing ideological against nuclear, but it is way overdue that nuclear boosters face the music and acknowledge what role the technology is having in the political landscape at the moment.