ViatorOmnium

Jesus fuking upside down Christ!

Do we need to unleash the emus to cull the Australians population again?

From UNICEF’s Children’s Version/TLDR the Convention on the Rights of the Child:

3. Best interests of the child

When adults make decisions, they should think about how their decisions will affect children. All adults should do what is best for children. Governments should make sure children are protected and looked after by their parents, or by other people when this is needed. Governments should make sure that people and places responsible for looking after children are doing a good job.

5. Family guidance as children develop

Governments should let families and communities guide their children so that, as they grow up, they learn to use their rights in the best way. The more children grow, the less guidance they will need.

(emphasis mine)

19. Protection from violence

Governments must protect children from violence, abuse and being neglected by anyone who looks after them.

This, plus all the rights that state that the default should be children being raised by their families, means what you are saying is literal international law everywhere except the US (though it’s a application is still… frankly non existent in most of the world)

It’s already on Safari and Firefox Nightly too.

Hyperrealistic acting also doesn’t help. Lots of actors insist on mumbling in a way that makes it hard to understand even if in a cinema.

I’m sure asking while making it clear there will be no consequences if they are ignored will change the situation on the ground. /s

Why not both. I once wrote an abomination that read and wrote data into a Google Spreadsheet, interacting with formulas in the spreadsheet in the process.

AMD on x86-64 and Qualcomm with a side of Apple for ARM.

Now apply that to roads, electricity grid, rail roads, hospitals, police, firefighters and everything that states pay to keep the economy running.

That’s what taxes are for, and the proposal on the table from the EU side is to tax big tech companies to make sure the basic digital infrastructure is well funded.

That’s not a good criteria, as it would exclude projects that are essential digital infrastructure like curl. The criteria for public investment needs to be general positive impact.

Is that an “Americans are big tech’s guinea pigs” kind of thing? I still didn’t get any video ruined by a dubbing AI.

It’s almost like most customers prefer function over form.

Yes, and Hitler was defending ethnic Germans from Polish persecution and retaliating for Gleiwitz incident which was completely not a false flag. /s

I listen to almost everything except what I listened at 14. At some point I figured out my peers had terrible musical taste and I started listening to what I actually enjoy.

I’m pretty sure everyone at my job trust me and I (or anyone else for that matter) don’t have enough access to wipeout a production DB on my own.

Why in frelling hell would they give full access to production to a LLM agent?

It looks like a nice mix of some of the worst design choices of C++ with some of the most dubious choices of Rust.

It’s funny that they never complain about the “free” roads or the “free” police.

That is not dead which can eternal lie.

Though HP’s disturbed mind couldn’t ever come up with something as upsetting as the average PHP application’s codebase.

They are suggesting Microsoft should use their own standards in a way that doesn’t require a bug for bug reimplementation of MS Office to read.

Journalists are not the source of the claim that LLMs are the path to AGI.

Tariffs only apply to physical goods, not services. And tariffs are usually based on origin, not seller. The physical goods those produce don’t come from the US, so they are mostly safe from tariffs. We need to have a digital service tax, but that should used to finance the digital commons (e.g. foss projects), not as a trade bargaining chip.