Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

So yeah I basically use the term wrong, my bad… I had no idea it had to be disruptive without outside influence.

Plenty of animals have gay sex, I don’t think we know of any that has an aversion to the opposite sex, to the point where they don’t try to procreate.

When I say something is “wrong” I mean something that is not like the average individual of that species…

I’ve never said anything negative about gays or trans people. I could not care less how people want to live their life.

I guess I should call it a mental differentiator instead of a mental disorder.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

deleted by creator

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Can you quote where that was said?

I’ve been following this debate for a bit and as far as I can tell it’s not so much that they’ll do what they can to keep rust out but more to make sure that the people who want to develop in rust are the ones who end up maintaining that part of the code and not the current maintainers.

Got it. Thanks for explaining.

But why would I count everyone? In an election you can’t the people that voted, since those are the votes you can possibly get…

I thought winning the popular vote was getting the majority of the votes that was cast. Is that incorrect?

169 three times in a row.

Seems like my blue/green divider is pretty consistent.

Didn’t he win the popular vote this last go around?

When talking about elections, only the people who actually voted are of interest

It’s obvious a candidate is not getting 50% of voters to vote for him if generally only 60% of the population votes…