r\etardataire(, bientôt 12 ans), principal coupable(, yay).

alt : https://lemmygrad.ml/u/soumerd_retardataire

  • 8 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 5th, 2022

help-circle
  • Yeah, wtf honestly, there’s a non negligible possibility that they clapped because israelis didn’t fire at them :

    (direct link if the video player doesn’t work, source)
    (and why do they need to be there anyway, to shoot ‘Hamas “terrorists”’/‘representatives of the gazan government’ ? And they usually end up shooting civilians for safety reasons because they’re too close to the truck, nothing makes sense, nor the stupid claim that aid should be stopped because otherwise Hamas members will be too well-fed to be able to fight back so they have to starve the 2M inhabitants. 30 years of ruling the region made Netanyahu overconfident in the west’s ability to state any justification and get away with it, they destroyed everything in Gaza f.f.s., every hospital, etc.)


  • From https://x.com/BenjaminNorton/status/1948865864935047607, it’s everyday :

    « The spring, which feeds the pumping station, is the main or backup water source for some 110,000 people, according to the Palestinian company that manages it – making it one of the most vital in the West Bank, where water is in chronic short supply. » (source
    « He said two other springs in the area had also recently been taken over. (…)
    “We have no options; digging a well is not allowed,” despite the presence of local water springs, he said, pointing to a well project that the UN and World Bank rejected due to Israeli law prohibiting drilling in the area.
    The lands chosen for drilling sit in the West Bank’s Area C, which covers more than 60 percent of the territory and is under full Israeli control. (…)
    Whereas nearly all residents of Israel and Israeli settlements have running water every day, only 36 percent of West Bank Palestinians do, the report said.»
    It’s not about filling a private pool, but about depriving palestinians of water, obviously. And there has been no investigation from the israeli police.

    And tomorrow it’ll be something else, at least internet laws haven’t made these informations illegal(, yet).

    note on these internet laws

    I thought in the past that profiling citizens could already be done through IP adresses, and that it was enough ; however because of VPNs or Tor, these new laws want to go further by not allowing any circumvention.
    Besides profiling citizens according to their opinions, there’s also the very valid threat of automatic sanctions(, see the law Avia in France, which enforced a ban on terrorist apologia in 1 hour, and hate speech in 24 hours, under the threat of huge sanctions, up to 4% of the social media’s worldwide turnover, it was fortunately partially censored in the end, but they still don’t see a problem with it, it was followed by a law on global security, the introduction of FranceConnect, and soon the same law than in the UK against anonymity online, in the name of protecting poor little children from pornography).
    Italy also aims to put an end to online anonymity in order to fight “hate speech”(, it’ll still be mandatory to hate your enemies), or misinformation(, we banned Red and African Stream, along with every russian media, misinformation is whatever isn’t allowed by our officials).
    The EU has the Digital Service Act, and the eIDAS 2.0 is coming, as well as perhaps Chat Control, which France’s attack on Pavel Durov give no doubt about their goal to end privacy(, including on Signal, ProtonMail, …), and we know that the next step will be an automatic sanction for illegal speeches.
    These sanctions were already in place for whomever is considered a terrorist(, e.g. it felt natural not to have any knowledge of Hamas’ point of view/narrative, nothing new since it’s always the same lies, ugly biases, atrocity propaganda, …). We(sterners), or at least we{french}, did not have much problems in censoring(, dis-informing,) “terrorist” or russian medias. So my guess is that the next step aims at targeting domestic medias, but what do i know, i can only see that the current censorship legislation/powers still aren’t enough for them, and that accusations of misinformation or hate speech have been abused, and will continue to be so.

    I.d.k., is Georges Ibrahim Abdallah right ?

    pointless remarks

    Even if Hamas implicitly recognized Israel in the Art.20 of its 2017 charter, its speeches, along with the lines of Iran and other antizionist states, seem to imply that they wouldn’t be satisfied with a two-states solution.
    I disagree with that stance, mainly because Israel isn’t left with any other choice than destroying them, since even sharing the land wouldn’t be enough.
    I’d advise going back to the position of 1988-1993 when the palestinians were the peaceful ones, admitting their unilateral defeat, and recognizing Israel, who, a.f.a.i.k., greedily wanted the rest of Palestine instead of making peace.
    But i’d also advise to never cease asking for a compensation for the lost territories, a compensation which has to come from western countries since israelis don’t have anything to offer. Which would mean that the arabs(, and other muslim-majority countries,) would refuse to have any commerce with the west as long as they’re not compensated for what’s objectively one of the most important loss of their history. It has to be through an alliance with the means to exert pressure and the will to stay cohesive, even if it’ll take them centuries to obtain a just retribution.
    Also, if they recognize Israel, they’ll have to absorb the israelis into their culture, so that they become middle-easterners and not westerners anymore, it’s not hard to envision a day when friendship among them and their neighbours will feel natural.
    But my point is that countries&movements that ask for a disparition of Israel will naturally be hunted down by israelis. And yes, Israel doesn’t want a two-states solution and they couldn’t give a damn about the ninth commandment(, or the sixth one and many others for that matter). As long as they don’t show their change of mind, e.g. by removing their illegal colonies and retreating to the 1967 borders(, or the 1948 ones), then i’ll continue to point them as the main responsible for this situation, just that i can’t pretend that they’re the only ones opposed to a two-states solution, even if they’re the main problem, that’s all.

    The second Intifada and Hamas wouldn’t have appeared if Israel respected the Oslo I and II agreements that it signed(, and every survey show that palestinians were much more supportive of them than israelis, videos show a radiant Yasser Arafat, he publicly praised again the Geneva Initiative in 2003 and authorized Abed Raddo to sign it, while Ariel Sharon categorically opposed it, as well as the Taba negotiations of 2001 and the Oslo agreements, once again Ehud Barak gave more hope but was replaced by the far-right).
    It’s Netanyahu who freezed the process in 1996 : the first step of the agreements were respected by Yitzhak Rabin(, withdrawal from Gaza and Jericho in 1994, Israel–Jordan peace treaty in 1994, Nobel peace prize in 1994, assassination of Y.Rabin in 1995, palestinian elections in 1996, and then israelis had 18 months to withdraw from the zone C towards the zones B and A), and even american negotiators like Dennis Ross said that the “further redeployments” in Annex I, Article I, Appendix 1, was understood as a total withdrawal, not Netanyahu’s 2%, who continued to increase the number of settlements in the West Bank, claiming a lack of security, but i’m not the only one who thinks that what they’re really interested in is an excuse to have more lands.
    Rejecting the two-states solution since 1977. Netanyahu only won with 50.4% in May 1996(, mainly thanks to four suicide bombings by Hamas in February-March 1996, causing 59 deaths, each time bumping his favorability ratings), the present would have been different.
    The Palestinian’s refusal of the two-states solution is a consequence of Israel’s refusal, not the cause.














  • Once again diprount_tomato was talking about countries outside of the u.s.s.r., those inside were there before, sometimes for centuries. But even inside the u.s.s.r., they weren’t forced to stay once it dislocated, despite being much more integrated than the u.k. ever was, not sure we could tell the same about the u.s.a. if one of your states decided to leave

    For Finland, you’re absolutely right for the first link you provided about the Winter war, thank you very much for the correction, i already knew about the Molotov cocktails named after their enemy so i should have remembered, seems like they were still salty about this loss of territory, i.d.k., yet i also provided arguments in favor of an initial “hunky dory” relation, it’s possible that it degraded over time for reasons other than merely territorial, perhaps like in Ukraine, i wouldn’t be surprised if Finland was used as an anti-communist spearhead and that security reasons weren’t that much of an excuse. Some further reading would need to be done.

    As for the baltic states, they were in the russian empire as well, before the u.s.s.r., you can’t blame them for refusing to destroy everything once they took power, we wouldn’t have done so in their position.
    And once again Poland wasn’t part of the u.s.s.r., cf. my remarks on the puppet states if that’s the road you want to take. I could agree that states of the Warsaw pact were influenced by their leaders just like countries in the n.a.t.o. are influenced by their american leader. What you called soviet invasion and american liberation would have been called exactly the opposite by the french communists.




  • I included these graphs because people are saying that communism doesn’t work, which is why we have to sanction them to death, for their own good(, and also because all of our enemies are dictators, what a coincidence, that’s a manipulation easy to disprove, old allies are suddenly depicted as authoritarians as soon as they change allegiances, while true authoritarians aren’t talked about, N.Chomsky and many others already proved this over and over).
    Freedom has always been our sole argument, without which we have nothing left to defend our side. And it’s not even a good one since poverty is slavery, “freely” working to fatten our annuitants lord capitalists. The entrepreneurial freedom isn’t that bad though, we all have to learn from each other and i would prefer for all ideologies to cohabit together instead of only one of them imposing his unique view. Think it was Hegel who said that theses need antitheses in order to evolve into better syntheses.

    I haven’t lived under the Stasi’s threat so for all i know i may be wrong and you may be right about the accusations of authoritarianism. It’s easy to prove that their paranoia wasn’t delusional though, they faced more powerful countries(, remember McCarthyism when the u.s.a. still thought that they were in a dangerous position, kinda isolated/outnumbered ? As stupid as it may seem, i quickly read the short comic “superman : red son”, and was pleasantly surprised to see that the author depicted an authoritarian u.s.a. once it began to lose the cold war, with economic difficulties, state separatism, …, that’s an honest take which should probably be kept in mind when discussing the soviet’s alleged authoritarianism, the only thing we remember about their society)
    And our representatives were elected by a population who believed our propaganda when it celebrated the west achievements while omitting the soviets ones, when it vilified the soviet’s actions and omitted our numerous misdeeds, …
    My point about authoritarianism is that it isn’t inherent to communist ideals(, on the contrary, “democratic socialism in deeds and not in words” has a meaning), and since «whomever wants to drown his dog accuses him of rage», i’m almost certain that they were exagerated, Solzhenitsyn wasn’t celebrated around the West for humanitarian reasons.
    When you see how many impossible odds the u.s.s.r. had to face before the second world war you can understand their authoritarianism, understandable in war conditions, and the Moscow trials were during the Spanish civil war, Trostkyists were indeed traitors collaborating against communists, including in Asia, while the black book of communism with its 100M death claims has been abundantly debunked, gulags were a sad thing of course but opposing communism “because freedom” is idiotic, i’m sorry.

    As for Syria, we both share an insignificant portion of the pain felt by the syrians, but i blame the west for opposing Bachar al-Assad(, elected by his population), while you blame him for not submitting. Fortunately Russia helped, we wouldn’t consider V.Putin a dictator if he was aligned with our actions around the globe, i could give you as many surveys as you want proving that he didn’t ever needed to cheat in the elections, contrary to our usual propaganda about our enemies, etc.


  • They were a part of the Warsaw pact, not the u.s.s.r., if they called dibs over the territory they would have the same leader.
    For the accusations of puppet states see the answer you replied to, i could say the same about n.a.to., the c.i.s., the e.u., … How to be united in diversity is an interesting topic of conversation

    As for Finland, not only was it not invaded by the communists, but they were the ones signing its independence from the russian empire.

    Was the u.s.s.r. a country or a union ? Even modern Russia is a federation, we don’t accuse the e.u. of having invaded other european countries, that’s partly why this topic of “diverse yet united” is so interesting.


  • Yeah i know(, that it’s a “far”-right political party(, not nazi, or else it’s hidden)), people dissatisfied with the current situation are voting either “extreme”-right or “extreme”-left, because what they understand the most is that they want to experiment a new situation, hoping that it will be better than the current one, the famous “protest vote”. That’s why poor people are voting far-right against their own interests, as if it’d solve their socio-economic problems(, i’m obviously biased in this assessment).

    As a german, you already know that communism was very popular in Germany during the 20s(, Marx&Engels came from there after all), and that nazis were fighting them in the street, there were deaths every week between them. Capitalist’s medias saw the growing popular disdain for the center and took an easy choice.