

Oh that might be a my-bad; it shows up as posted/updated 7 hours ago for me because the edit time replaces the original post time on Voyager (at least)
Oh that might be a my-bad; it shows up as posted/updated 7 hours ago for me because the edit time replaces the original post time on Voyager (at least)
You clearly missed the news yesterday lol
This is the first time I’ve seen someone suggest PowerTools specifically to waste energy lol
It’s never really been about upfront price so much as longevity. If you can avoid a laptop upgrade e.g. every 5 years by upgrading just a few components instead, it’ll last you longer and cost you less longterm.
Fundamentally, the cheapest way to build electronics is with very little modularity. Making parts swappable is more complicated to design and needs more components to be included. Both drive up the cost of the product.
No sweat if it’s too expensive or that’s not what you care about (ok, though you should sweat not caring about longevity), but making it all about the price is sort of missing the point. Capitalism is a tool for improving our lives but is not the only tool for that.
What scenarios do you envision a Result<Result<T, E>, E> having a different meaning than a Result<T, E>? To me, the messy Result type just seems like a case of something that should’ve been handled already (or properly propagated up).
Agreed, but it’s up to the politicians (unfortunately) to fix the voting process. All we can do is sit back and enjoy the people pointing out the absurdities in the process.
Certainly a much better contender than the king of genocide enablement (Trump)
This, among other things, is what makes me wish nobody cared about branding. The trademark should be meaningless. It’s just another store with no real relation to the original other than the name.