• 0 Posts
  • 63 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 11th, 2025

help-circle


  • Nah, that’s what Lot did when he was hosting a couple of angels for God, who had sent them there to Lot (the only good man in Sodom) to see if he or anyone in Sodom was worth saving. Then an angry mob shows up to Lot’s house and demands that Lot let than rape the angels, cause they were hot. Lot instead offers up his two daughters (who were fucking each other anyway, so whatevs) to be raped by the crowd. God thinks that that’s cool, so he promises Lot and his wife safe passage out of Sodom as he destroys it, but them must swear to not look back upon it’s destruction. While they are leaving town, Lot’s wife looks back at the city being destroyed and is turned into a pillar of salt.



  • Hi there. I’m an artist who gives away everything for free because I don’t personally think it’s ethical to profit from pure human emotional expression. I also don’t think it’s ethical for some faceless corporation to profit from my art. I will ABSOLUTELY fight against my art being used to train AI models, but I have ABSOLUTELY no desire to profit. In fact, I have the opposite desire.

    So tell me exactly what is rent-seeking?











  • There was this Supreme Court case in 1973 "Miller v. California, during which the Supreme Court basically decided that it has to be obscene in order to be considered pornography, and then the question became, “What is legally considered to be obscene?” From that case we derive something called the “Miller Test”, which has three criteria:

    1. Whether “the average person, applying contemporary community standards”, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.

    2. Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions specifically defined by applicable state law.

    3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

    For a something to be considered pornographic, it must be ALL THREE criteria, with the first two criteria being left in the hands of local ordinances and governments, and the last being left sort of up to interpretation depending on a locality’s culture and values.


  • The definition of pornography has changed over time. Caligula might have been considered pornography AT THE TIME, but by modern legal definitions, I don’t think it passes. Even the extended version with penetration, because the film isn’t “intended to arouse” and also does not “lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value”.





  • Oh I’ve never heard of that! My dad grew up in West Germany, and he would always have Braunschweiger and brown mustard on rye, which I sometimes liked sometimes didn’t, but I’ll have to get my meat eating roommate to try this Mettbrötchen and report back. Seems like a classic working class lunch