MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, any]

I looove Marmite!

Upvote ≠ Endorsement

  • 1 Post
  • 2.21K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 19th, 2022

help-circle



  • There’s not much to post about to be honest. I could do some posts on the evolving air war in Ukraine, or Iranian ballistic missile performance, or various air defence systems, but actually writing it out would take hours, it’s quite complicated, and it’s not really “news”. There also hasn’t been any changes in the past few weeks, so I’d just be repeating myself, which is a waste of time for me, for the news mega readers, for everyone involved.

    Russia is still attacking Ukrainian airbases with the weekly attack on Kiev, Ukraine is still attacking rail infrastructure with the weekly strike on Russian oil infrastructure. Russian long range air defence struggles to shoot down Ukrainian fighter aircraft due to an over-reliance on ground based sensors, Ukrainian fighter aircraft’s air to air missiles are outranged by Russian aircraft’s air to air missiles. Iranian ballistic missiles with the range to hit Israel still have relatively poor accuracy, shorter range Iranian ballistic missiles have precision strike accuracy.

    Breaking down air defence systems and their capabilities would probably be the most interesting and new content.


  • The recent rants of Dmitry Medvedev, ex President and Prime Minister of Russia, and current deputy head of the security council. Medvedev has been Putin’s right hand man since the 1990s, for over three decades, this is why what he says matters to an extent. Russia uses Medvedev’s social media posts and ramblings to portray more controversial (and sometimes straight up outrageous) opinions, allowing Putin to avoid the flak, and allowing for these posts to be seperate from official government statements. A “good cop bad cop” strategy, if you will. Medvedev’s not just a random shit poster, though you’d be forgiven for thinking that, given just how out there some of his statements are. Up until now, no one has taken what he’s said completely seriously, because of the above. But that’s changed.

    Medvedev, July 15th, in response to Trump’s press conference with NATO leader Rutte on Twitter:

    Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn’t care.

    The usual type of thing you’d expect from him. But Medvedev’s tone changed abruptly two days later, July 17th, in a TASS interview. Turns out Russia did actually care, and Medvedev starts talking about pre-emptive strikes:

    “We [Russia] need to act accordingly. To respond in full. And if necessary, launch preemptive strikes [against NATO]. What is happening today is a proxy war, but in essence it is a full-scale war (launches of Western missiles, satellite intelligence, etc.), sanctions packages, loud statements about the militarisation of Europe”.

    On July 28th, when Trump announced a 10 day deadline for a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war, Medvedev took to Twitter again:

    Trump’s playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember 2 things:

    1. Russia isn’t Israel or even Iran.
    2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don’t go down the Sleepy Joe road!

    And in response to Lindsey Graham:

    It’s not for you or Trump to dictate when to ‘get at the peace table’. Negotiations will end when all the objectives of our military operation have been achieved. Work on America first, gramps!

    Medvedev then took to his personal Telegram to issue a thinly veiled nuclear threat, with regards to a second strike this time:

    About Trump’s threats against me on his personal network Truth, which he banned from operating in our country

    If some words of the former president of Russia cause such a nervous reaction from the whole so formidable president of the USA, it means that Russia is right in everything and will continue to go its way.

    And about India and Russia’s “dead economy” and “entering dangerous territory” - well, let him remember his favourite Walking Dead movies and how dangerous a non-existent "dead hand"😂 can be.

    In reference to the Perimeter/Dead Hand nuclear weapons control system in Russia, designed to launch Russia’s ICBMs even if all command centres are taken out, by detecting radiation from a first strike on Russia. It’s speculated to be both operational in a semi automatic mode, where a commander must first activate/switch on the system, and after that it can operate in a fully automatic mode, operating without the need of human intervention to launch ICBMs. Medvedev could be hinting that the system is in high alert mode/operating fully automatically at the moment, or threatening to put it in such a mode.

    Trump and the United States have, for the first time, chosen to take Medvedev seriously and at his word, and have publicly announced that two Ohio Class Ballistic Missile Submarines are currently patrolling with Russia in mind , via Trump on Truth Social.

    Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

    Each Ohio Class SSBN can carry 24 Trident II SLBMs each, with either 8 high yield nuclear warheads (475kt W88) per Trident II, or 12 lower yield warheads (5-100kt W76, depending on variant) per Trident II. Under the NEW START treaty, the SSBNs were limited to 20 Trident IIs each, and averaged around 4 warheads per Trident II. But Russia withdrew NEW START in 2023, neither Russia or the United States are obligated to follow it as of now, and it’s set to expire in February 2026. The submarines were likely already there beforehand, the US has 4 SSBNs on patrol at any time. Trump’s statement just serves as a very public reminder. Russia is not the only country that can play this game in the media with thinly veiled nuclear threats, and mentioning pre-emptive and second strike capabilitiy, is what Trump is trying to say.


  • Exclusive: Indian state refiners pause Russian oil purchases, sources say - Reuters, 31 July 2025

    Indian state refiners have stopped buying Russian oil in the past week as discounts narrowed this month and U.S. President Donald Trump warned against purchasing oil from Moscow, industry sources said. India, the world’s third-largest oil importer, is the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude.

    The country’s state refiners - Indian Oil Corp (IOC.NS), Hindustan Petroleum Corp (HPCL.NS), Bharat Petroleum Corp (BPCL.NS), and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd (MRPL.NS) - have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources familiar with the refiners’ purchase plans told Reuters.

    IOC, BPCL, HPCL, MRPL and the federal oil ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comment.

    The four refiners regularly buy Russian oil on a delivered basis and have turned to spot markets for replacement supply - mostly Middle Eastern grades such as Abu Dhabi’s Murban crude and West African oil, sources said.

    Private refiners Reliance Industries (RELI.NS) and Nayara Energy are the biggest Russian oil buyers in India, but state refiners control over 60% of India’s overall 5.2 million barrels per day refining capacity.

    On July 14, Trump threatened 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine.

    This isn’t a suprise, as the Indian state owned refiners (Indian Oil Corp in particular) already said that they would no longer be purchasing Russian oil over a week ago.














  • Poland just wants to buy as much military equipment as they physically can in the shortest amount of time possible. Just look at the lists of what they’re buying, it’s quite wild for a country with less than 40 million people. Obviously the money doesn’t exist to buy all this stuff right now, so they have to use loans. The US is more than prepared to give out such loans (at least for now), so they can arm Poland to the teeth. 32 F-35s and 6 Patriot batteries on order, as well as looking at the South Korean KF-21 4.5/5th generation aircraft (with 36 South Korean FA-50s already on order), and US F-15EXs. There’s already an AEGIS ashore site in Poland as of last year as well. And that’s just higher level air defence and air force stuff, not counting all the tanks they want to buy. Poland borders Belarus, Ukraine, Lithuania and most importantly, the Russian enclave Kaliningrad.


  • Yeah, the Rafale is ultimately a 4th generation aircraft. It may be a very good 4.5/4+++ generation aircraft, but ultimately still a 4th generation aircraft. There are many competitors in this regard, from the Su-35, to the F-15EX, to the Eurofighter Typhoon for heavy fighters, and the J-10, Gripen, F-16V in the light fighter category. Self protection systems/electronic countermeasures/towed decoys cannot replace stealth and 5th generation capabilities. In fact, stealth greatly enhances how effective all of the above is. If your radar cross section is smaller, the effective range of electronic countermeasures/jamming can be a lot higher, as the radar signature you’re trying to obscure is a lot smaller.

    As for the India-Pakistan conflict, a lot of that was due to poor mission planning/intelligence on Pakistani capabilities, and overconfidence on the first strike, where India thought they could just launch a limited attack on Pakistani territory without engaging Pakistani ground based air defence and limited engagements with Pakistani fighter aircraft. That was obviously not the case, Pakistan engaged India with all of their capabilities, and India lost 4-5 aircraft. On the second Indian attack, India hit all their targets without losing a single aircraft, and Pakistan was unable to intercept the Indian aircraft and shot down very few incoming Indian stand off munitions. So once India took Pakistan’s actual capabilities into account, they were able to carry out strikes with little to no consequences, and the Pakistani retaliatory strikes did little damage. So Pakistan won the battle but lost the war, I would say.