MF_BROOM [he/him]

  • 13 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 28th, 2022

help-circle
  • If I may bring up my experience being a vegan: people don’t like being wrong on a subject. If someone is made to feel like an evil person, even if I explicitly never said anything close to that, their rage metre goes to 100%. I’m sure plenty of non-vegan leftists have similar reactions with other modes of oppression. I’m guessing people get pretty illogical when called a racist or misogynist?

    As someone who is also vegan and anti-COVID/anti-letting-pandemics-spread-in-perpetuity, yeah, I think some liberals and even self-identifying leftists feel offended and maybe experience some kind of cognitive dissonance when someone around them is doing an action that is reducing harm more than their own action (assuming they have the capacity to do so, I know masks can be expensive and not in everyone’s budget, and maybe not everyone has access to a local mask bloc, but I digress). And sometimes resort to whataboutisms that are annoying as fuck to justify their own behavior (“You say we should all veganize our lifestyles as much as we practically can, but what about the Inuit, or people with food insensitivities, or people who rely on others for meals?” or “You say we should all be masking, but how do you expect deaf people to understand you with a mask on?”) Acting as though there aren’t alternatives (like speech-to-text apps or even learning ASL) for the latter, and as if I’m specifically asking those specific groups of people to go vegan in the former (emphasis on the “as far as practical” part applies).

    Anyways, I’m sorry you’re going through all of that bullshit.



  • COVID is back? I thought it went away? First time I’m hearing this trump-who-must-go

    But seriously, solidarity with anyone out there still trying to protect themself and/or their community, especially if you are surrounded by a bunch of reactionaries who have profound mask trauma from not being able to drink inside a Starbucks for like four weeks in 2020.








  • I forgot to ask, if you don’t mind, since you said you’re someone who has helped with hiring employees, I was wondering if you had any advice on whether to focus on one specific reason for a gap, or whether to mention all factors. Because in my case, it was definitely multiple factors that have contributed to my gap, between the loss of my father and then caretaking. I’m also feeling like maybe I shouldn’t mention anything at all about being a stay-at-home parent but idk.

    I really have trouble figuring out the best way to explain the gap if it comes up (which it often does). My hunch says it might be best to just focus on one thing and keep it succinct, mention how it’s resolved, and then turn it around and say some shit about how I’m eager to work again and excited for this role blah blah blah, but I’m honestly not sure.



  • Ah damn, solidarity, my friend. Don’t you just love how remote work, something that is far more inclusive than in-person work, was demonized by the capitalists and a shit ton of companies did RTO mandates in lockstep? I honestly never realized how overstimulating and draining in-person work could be for my neurospicy ass until I worked remotely. I wish everyone could have the option to work remotely, if desired. sadness

    I definitely have had to take little breaks from job searching due to a bit of burnout as well, can’t imagine doing it nonstop for 2 years, damn.

    So, I’ve historically worked in bullshit roles in a bullshit industry that definitely can be done as freelancing, and it is something I’ve considered putting on a resume before. I actually thought about using one of those freelance sites for real to build a portfolio, but was dissuaded when I heard that it can be really hard to even start nowadays, so idk. But regardless, I could probably get friends to pretend to be clients if I wanted to go that route. Thanks for the advice






  • If you live in the US, the rapid tests are absurdly expensive–like sometimes $10 per test. Which also isn’t great because rapid tests have a not-insignificant false negative rate, and, well, sometimes you just get a shitty test that straight up doesn’t even work (i.e. the control line doesn’t even show up).

    I recently used this site in the UK to purchase some FlowFlex tests: https://www.visionpharmacy.com/products/flowflex-antigen-rapid-covid-test-1-test-kit

    I believe there’s a flat rate for worldwide shipping is £19.99, which is currently just under $26 USD. So larger purchases make more sense if you can swing it or split the cost of an order with someone else. So if you purchased like 50 tests, that would be like a little under $2.50 per test. Free shipping on orders over £50. I also used the discount code WELCOME10 to get an extra 10% off.

    My recent order had an expiration date on the tests of October 2025, so, pretty good! But your mileage may vary.

    As for why I suggest FlowFlex specifically, well, when the other two people in my household got COVID at the beginning of the year, on the very first day of both of them having symptoms, FlowFlex immediately showed a positive test for both of them. I’m pretty sure the quick detection was a big reason why I avoided getting infected myself (obviously the bigger reason was because of quarantining, but I digress).

    My understanding is that FlowFlex is also one of the better rapid tests out there. An excerpt from their site:

    The performance of the Flowflex COVID-19 Antigen Home Test was established in an all-comers clinical study conducted between March 2021 and May 2021 with 172 nasal swabs self-collected or pair-collected by another study participant from 108 individual symptomatic patients (within 7 days of onset) suspected of COVID-19 and 64 asymptomatic patients. All subjects were screened for the presence or absence of COVID-19 symptoms within two weeks of study enrollment. The Flowflex COVID-19 Antigen Home Test was compared to an FDA authorized molecular SARS-CoV-2 test. The Flowflex COVID-19 Antigen Home Test correctly identified 93% of positive specimens and 100% of negative specimens.

    Obviously a few years old, so idk how well this holds up against the current dominant variants out there. I am unfortunately having trouble finding the original study, and I know anecdotes only count for so much, but yeah, these are the best rapid tests I’ve used so far.