Absolutely not

Take a cup of milk and a cup of sugar and some cinnamon and that’s what these fat fucks are freaking out over.

From their perspective that’s what they’re doing though. The means to help their kind just involves more collateral damage and what ends up indistinguishable from targeted pain.

That does nothing for withdrawn consent or limited consent. This means once you sign, anything goes, and your ability to claim otherwise it’s likely zero.

This is good for the law, but likely enhances retaliatory claims and quells legit claims of withdrawn consent. On the other side it makes positive kit tests with no consent document a slam dunk.

Combine that with getting rid of celebrity actors, this would be great. Need fresh faces.

The hard part is when back to back traffic for 15 miles worth of cars is coming from one direction and everyone else is either too scared to zipper merge or they allow the one direction to have perpetual right of way.

At some point of heavy traffic, the circle right of way must yield for zipper merging, else face my ass aggro merging and beeping at everyone who doesn’t.

Very depressing. We’re social animals, and being highly literate and informed while also socially apt, you really realize just how far apart you are from others, which is alienating, frustrating, and tiresome.

Regulate profit on housing, problem solved.

They got revokeable permission apparently.

This is why when you get permission, where you must plan for a decade of work, and they are saying yes, you get them to say in perpetuity and non-revokeable.

So just a slightly different flavor.

This is the exact semantic they are talking about in the post. You just have different semantic parent objects. You want trans/cis with parent of woman, they used Transwoman/woman with parent as person. They are semantically equivalent.

Edit: appears they will be going into federal garnishment, not private collections.

Right, but once they are taken by a private collections company, would they still carry that with them? I assume at some point the collections company actually buys out the loan in hopes of collecting more. Once they buy out the loan, they are owed, but at this point it’s arguable the non-defaultable student loan was paid.

Doesn’t this give a 7 year path to full default and erasure or something similar that federal loans wouldn’t have?

Logistics is not an artificial creation however

So you don’t really want to archive in the technical sense, you want it offline for security, which is valid but extremely inconvenient for regular end users.

Warranty… Some are 15-20 years, but you need proof of purchase docs, which are often emailed data.

It has a bad name because it’s rooted in magical thinking and overall ill intent regardless of what a few do.

It’s likely easier for people to learn to love trans people than understand there are no fish… If that tells you anything.

Public ledger blockchain is genius technology, whether you can imagine a use-case you consider valid is not a condition for it to actually be an amazing construction.