

Thank you for the detailed reply. It was useful, not rambling.
The distinction you made between actively using an older computer and leaving it idling as a server helped me decide what direction makes sense. This is also my fallback PC, and I still use older games and physical discs, so I think keeping it is more valuable than selling it cheaply.
I am now considering using it as an on-demand AI and self-hosting lab. It could synchronise files and make backups whenever it is switched on, while also running Linux, containers, local models and automation experiments. I would then shut it down when I am finished rather than leaving it online continuously.
I also agree that replacing usable hardware purely for efficiency can be misleading once manufacturing impact is considered. My goal is now to extend its useful life without pretending that an old FX desktop is an efficient 24/7 NAS.
Your point about treating the electricity use as an investment in learning was probably the most useful perspective for me.
I am interested in automation, local AI and self-hosting, so even if this is not an efficient permanent server, it could still be a very useful experimental machine. I think I will keep it off most of the time and switch it on specifically for learning, backups, AI experiments or older games.
I will also look into undervolting once I have checked the exact motherboard and measured how stable the machine is. Thanks for pushing me to think about the value of the skills rather than only the efficiency of the hardware.