While we are at it. Maybe it should be ordered from big to small, as this way it is easier to compare each part. Another way of displaying the buckets would be in a histogram, this will bring more structure and more clarity to the size comparisons between each bucket.

deleted by creator

With the rank and file labels added, you could have flipped the board, or even rotated it by 90°

#Wordle1455 4/6* Grade: B+

⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜ C
🟨🟩🟨⬜⬜ C+.
⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 C.
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 A+.

https://gradle.app/#20sWdU3RAAMlpCRh0iqnW

NewPipe (or Tubular if you like the sponsor skipping that is also available in revanced) might be something for you? Although it might be too little bloat for you as you can only read comments and not comment yourself

Sed >>>>> Vi >>>>> Kate >>>>> Vi$ual$tudio

With this reasoning, would you say everything that a computer does makes sense, because it always follows the implementation? Or am I missing something?

Not oc, but thank you for explaining

What do you mean by europe/german language?

I couldn’t when I was younger. Now I can, but not for more than 2 seconds

But currently it is 2025, how do you explain that?

given / is a directory

Can it not be a directory? How?

https://maps.app.goo.gl/hPQahGuQQpM8NUZv5 In case we wanted more information, here they were eating

To answer the question: The professor assumes the email referred to 1900-1910 with “late 1900s”. As this was normal 20 years ago (and still gets used). He then gets upset realising the age difference between him and his student was likely the main contributor to this incorrect assumption.

To ask a question back: From https://www.bucknell.edu/fac-staff/john-penniman, I read:

John Penniman is Associate Professor and chair of Religious Studies

I would say for religious studies it should be fine. But also for other areas, why can’t you use 1994 papers?

Tom Scotts take: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIFE7h3m40U

I fully agree!

In person timed tests suffer from people under performing because of external circumstances. Also we should consider chatgpt as a tool that can be used like a calculator. If the answer to a test can be easily retrieved for a widely available tool, the test is only measuring performance that is no longer required. Where possible, ideally measuring performance is based on their skill during a larger time period regardless of the tools they might use. For example repeated in-person peer review sessions (without a specific time slot) could both improve once performance and generating evidence of performance over time while reducing effort from the staff

This will break posts where the author intends to format the title in large letters

Even then I think this might be a good solution. This prevents users abusing this to get attention. I don’t see a legitimate reason the receiver would like some titles to be larger than others

I could do it in two clicks:

Click on this link https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.safetycore

Click uninstall