If my representative was using a robot to decide how to promote their ideas, I’d be pissed.

These people were elected to represent the people based (presumably) on their own words and opinions. If they can’t muster the energy to support their constituents themselves, without relying on a robot to spew up generic bile, then they should step down and let someone who cares do it.

Ah, these images have been a staple in tourist gift shops for decades! Fridge magnets. Tea Towels that are for looking at, not for using. Stubby holders. Keyrings.

THIS is Australian culture.

So because we can’t immediately fix our world, we should abandon all hopes and dreams of a better future?

If people want to envision a future for mankind that is a bit farfetched, what’s the harm? Let it inspire people to make the world a better place. Better than being a cynical prick who scoffs at any sort of positive ideology.

And this comment is why women often do not go topless, even if the laws in a country allow it.

A few more people to throw on the ‘will step over the bodies of trans people for the bag’ pile.

without direct human interference.

climate change is the likely culprit.

Sure glad we humans didn’t do a climate change or anything.

“We are against genocide”

‘I can’t believe you hate Israel, you antisemite!’

This feels like a rather large self-report.

The next time I found him after unlocking the needolin, I rushed around to earn enough silk to play with him as long as possible.

This mindset from people is what makes online multiplayer games unplayable for me.

I don’t get a lot of time to play games as an adult. When I do, I don’t particularly want people telling me how I should be having fun. There is this weird competition that happens where you need to know everything about a game before you are allowed to partake in the game. It sucks to have missed out on so many experiences, but i guess my not playing sub-optimally made someone else’s experience better, so it’s all good.

4d Squid Guy

I think, in western media at least, that the tank is rarely used as an image of defence. A tank’s artillery is not personal or protective, it obliterates its targets from a distance. Its treads allow it to travel in terrain that has been decimated by war. The image of a tank ominously rolling over rubble and bodies in a war zone is contractually obliged to be in every war movie.

The heavy armour on a tank is perhaps its only ‘defensive’ trait, but it only exists to let the men inside blow things up for as long as possible.

It’s an all terrain cannon, and a country owning a fleet of them requires their neighbours to also invest in a fleet of them, just in case. This then causes their neighbours to invest in more tanks just to be extra ‘safe’