Everyone is bighype about carcinization- crablike this, convergent evolutionary pressures that- nobody ever mentions arborification. Did you know that ‘trees’ evolved independently dozens of times? Trees and crabs, that’s what we’ll find on alien planets I tells ya.
this image makes me deeply uncomfortable
It’s the perpetual motion machine that laid the golden egg…
Everytime I think I’m doing well enough to “put myself out there” I crash out again. I think I’ll probably die alone.
what verse should i be quoting?
No, you’ve missed it. We’ve moved on from “That never happened” to “It wasn’t actually a big deal” already.
i think war might predate capitalism
A video hosting service?
source
upvote for the 2 belonging to outer world.
outer what? who’s world?
It’s not very effective…
There’s a host of factors that lead into the degredation of (at least google) search over the last decade or so. Many have already been brought up, but one that hasn’t is the result of the SEO arms race. When google first got popular, people realized they could game the algorithm by embedding keywords in their page to make the page appear in more searches. Google found a way to correct that, but it’s been whack-a-mole with the so-called “Search Engine Optimization” industry ever since. These days, google says ‘eh, fuck it’ and basically runs a pay-to-play service to rank up people who are willing to pay to have their page listed higher. Most people don’t even click past the first page, so not getting on the first page is effectively a death sentence for that page/site. It’s a real incestuous/autocannibalizing cesspool anymore. Google search is now quite literally an ad listing rather than a search index.
okay if the problem is “the thing i made is being used in a way i dont like,” that’s still separate from theft/copyright infringement.
so its harrison bergeron then? ai must be limited to be equal with humans?
op’s complaint is that “ai is theft/copyright infringement” is a fundamentally different argument than “ai is energy-intensive/pollutive” and that if youre upset about the co2 then argue against the co2; if youre upset about copyright infrengement, why are other derivative works valid. it was in the op actually.
idk there’s plenty of legitimate criticism to lob at america’s gun fetishism but i just dont see the application here