I didn’t know about it, that’s interesting, to say the least

You mean that a government with one of the most well funded intelligence services in the world, knew that an attack was coming from a region they completely control, from a manufactured rebel group they partly fund. And they let this attack happen, and their citizens die and used it as a casus belli to raze, and ethnically cleanse said region because they want to completely colonize and claim it as their own?

That’s definitely a first in the history of humanity and I’m utterly shocked, really!

Hard and soft links have existed on NTFS for decades at this point

Un truc comme ça aujourd’hui et on aurait toute une branche des médias et du gouvernement qui irait trouver des excuses à ses actions

It’s fair to say they can’t support games forever. But in that case make games that don’t need support forever or provide the software to run the games for free after some time.

Welcome on .ml !

Funding the army to protect yourself and your neighbours from aggression is very different from funding the army to invade a sovereign country.

I’m not arguing it’s not one of the reasons for increasing the budget, but arguing it’s to attack Russia is just dishonest.

Oh yeah, it’s to totally send boots in Russia and walk on Moscow of course, we’ve almost done it once, we can do it again!
That’s totally not a big jump to a fantasized conclusion fed to y’all by known Russian propagandists. The author of the article somehow manages to grasp the problem and dishonestly draw wrong conclusions from it.

There are many reasons to increase the Army’s budget. Funneling money to Macron’s friends in the armament industry is one of them, preparing the public opinion for a war that will never happen to justify “sacrifices” and austerity is another.

I don’t think there’s any point in debating about this on .ml anyway. You’ve probably made up your mind about this already.

Also, denazification didn’t really work. Many Nazis kept their positions or were hired somewhere else, mostly free of consequences.

I mean, they actually submitted the idea of removing two national holidays to “save money”. The dishonest part here is “to fight Russia”, even though the next budget is expected to increase the army’s budget.

One month is not enough to really feel the overwhelming distress of living paycheck to paycheck kicking in.

“Oopsies, we meant to kill one dude, but we killed too children, I guess these bombs are not that high precision, am I right ?”

Eg. Pretty much every group of people in the history of humanity. We tend to forget that we’re just dumb animals with dumb animal instinct sometimes.

Isn’t that the tyranny of the majority? The fact that a larger percentage of the population does something, doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the better thing.

On peut vraiment plus rien dire !

Even though it failed, it probably highlighted how fragile the balance for sustainable life is, like no other experiment could have.

J’ai peut être mal compris le commentaire original, mais ce que je voulais dire, c’est que si le but c’est de balancer de la merde qui incite en masse à la haine et à la division, ça fonctionne très très bien pour ceux à qui ça profite.

Ah bah si, là pour le coup il fonctionne très très bien. C’est juste une question de point de vue

I really like YAML but way too many people use it beyond its purpose… I work with Gitlabci and seeing complex bash scripts inline in YAML files makes me want to hurt people.