To an extent, but 10 skilled diverse people will result in higher quality than 10 skilled same people.
So yes, care about skill, but also make sure you get some free innovation by having varied opinions from differing cultures, backgrounds, genders, etc.
You’re right, you will definitely get downvoted with that opinion. The corpos sucking up data to track and advertise and whatever else is annoying, and i don’t want to make it even easier for them. And i definitely don’t want to help my shitass government round up undesirables any easier than they already can (including from those corpos…). There are no positives that i care about from an actual digital id. Privacy is harder and harder to come by everywhere in life, i don’t want to give an ID to use discord, steam, lemmy, or anything else.
Nah, fuck the AG for tying these 2 issues together. They don’t give a fuck about gambling, they just see a huge marketplace ripe for online ID and are snaking their way into it if they can.
Case and point right here with that correction.
So glad Digital Foundry escaped them and went independent.
They didn’t listen at all. We don’t want id verification. Period. Full stop.
Switching from terrible to potentially less terrible isn’t listening.
You can thank the ai companies for the intolerance, many are okay with the technology itself.
I wouldn’t equate it with any human teacher still though. Even someone who has difficulty saying “i don’t know.” Has less difficulty saying it than LLMs do, hallucinations are an unsolved problem for now.
Not op, but i assume they just mean talking to an llm about spiritual topics. Especially local ai, if you pick a less censored model so it doesnt constantly spit refusals, they can hold conversations on difficult topics pretty well now. Whether that is politics, religion, law, finance, medicine, or roleplaying porn, doesnt really matter to the llm.
This could use more granularity
Yeah images is actually a bad example for us humans. Using a small model with a modern lora, you can generate near photorealistic images, easily 1 every second or so on moderate hardware.
Granted we can make 1 “perfect” image better than most big image models typically can even with lots of time, but thats a different discussion.
We’re talking about “elites” of society. So yes, you should do the bare minimum google search on the person you’re emailing about getting in touch with a billionaire lol.
This isn’t some small example where you were trying to get in touch with someone at your medical insurance agency and unknowingly wound up on the phone with a convicted rapist who made the local news…
If you were rich you’d love to have been one of those associates it seems. It’s the only explanation for the way you defend them. The absolute dissonance required to be like, “yeah he was is sex trafficking minors, but i wonder if he can also throw me a good normal party on his island that is totally normal” is asinine… These people don’t need your defense. Why are you even bothering?
Are we gonna ignore the exploitation it took for you to have 900 million? 800? 500?.. nobody has an exact cutoff, but at some point an individual has effectively won capitalism, and that point is looooong before you reach 1 billion.
Look again, there is a specific watch button for opening multiple, then you gotta switch to grid view and turn off the setting that shows users on the grid.
Tell us you know nothing about orbital dynamics without telling us you know nothing about orbital dynamics.
Go play some ksp at least and then come back here.
Kessler syndrome may very well be real, but even with todays pace, its insanely far away. Leo is crowded on a visualization sure, but thats because each satellite is at least a pixel in size, which is obviously necessary but sorta dumb. put that at a proper scale and it’s still much less crowded than even the air is with planes.
And no, not all “layers” are “filled.” Not even close. Space is fucking mind bogglingly huge. Put some filters on the visualizing tool. Less than 600km periapsis shows you everything that would decay within a few years. Focus on the red debris and you can see that in action. Not too much there, mostly active satellites.
Filter at 600-800 and we’re talking many years decay time, decades even. Debris there is much more serious and its exactly where we start to see a lot on visualizers because of old collisions and bad stewardship before we cared about these things. But also, focus on the “edge” (for lack of a better term), of the visualizer to see the depth. Notice how although it is looking dense, its really not, things are spread all over that height range, and remember the scale issue. Not to mention there is just less here overall than the lowest orbits.
Goto 800+ and we’re talking 100+ years of decay time where kessler actually matters, and the density is now dropping rapidly with distance.
Theyre getting more attention from all these articles every day than they ever had before for sure. Theyre loving this. None of their games have had much success, reviews low, player counts near 0… https://steamdb.info/developer/Santa+Ragione/
I dont care what obscure indie awards they won, 99% of people commenting, complaining, etc have never heard of the studio or their games, even within the indie space, the numbers show that.
Those pieces would still have their original low periapsis and deorbit pretty quick. Kessler syndrome isn’t about very low orbits where drag is significant
User numbers are still far too low for this to be a practical positive imo.
If they price this well, it’ll be the new standard recommend instead of quest 3. I’m sick of meta so i’ll gladly swap over.
Nobody ever says to pick the worse fit candidate just because they are a woman or whatever. That is a bullshit talking point by small minded people.