• 2 Posts
  • 862 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle












  • I wish all the firmware for every motherboard was made public and open sourced. Even if a company has proprietary firmware/drivers, I would hope that once that product reaches end of life that they do in fact open source that code so that someone else can pick up where they left off.

    I 100% agree that they should not brick their hardware once it reaches end of life. There might be someone out there who would take on the task of maintaining it, which is better than nobody maintaining it.



  • Its funny because the release notes for their December '21 BIOS update says:

    Major vulnerabilities updates, customers are strongly encouraged to update to this release at the earliest.

    And many of their release notes say that they fix security issues. I would say that supercedes the footnote at the bottom that says to update your BIOS only if you’re having issues.

    Plus, doesn’t Gigabyte have A/B BIOS updates? So if you have a failed flash, you can switch to the previous BIOS that was working?




  • Some vendors still have a red flag on their support page discouraging uefi updates unless you’re actively experiencing problems.

    I dont know which vendor you are referring to, but that is a horrible practice. There should be active support and release notes stating that “This release is a security fix” at a bare minimum. If your motherboard manufacturer does not offer that, then I could never recommend them to someone. They need to be held to a higher standard.

    At least from my experience, ASUS, Dell, and Apple will publish that information.


  • Even if the code is there, you will need someone to maintain that code. Easier or not, even in a git repository, those individual components will eventually not have the support necessary to patch it.

    If an eight year old usb controller has flaws, and the manufacturer is not maintaining that git repository anymore because they cannot possibly afford to hire someone to look at that code after so long, then it is going to keep those flaws. It wont matter if that code is proprietary or open source and included in coreboot. Its just simply not feasible to support hardware properly once most of the world has moved on to other products.


  • Generally, motherboard manufacturers source their components from other companies. They do not manufacture the entire board themselves. This includes CPUs, Wifi cards, USB controllers, bluetooth, audio, display controllers, etc. Each and every one of them create new products, maintain their own firmware for all those new products, and push updates to the motherboard manufacturers when there are updates.

    Coreboot/libreboot do not update those components themselves. They also must be provided that source code.

    Just for coreboot alone, the last release had more than 120 contributors push over 900 commits. One person is not able to maintain that piece of software, as it is an enormous task.