Almost like this person is part of the problem.

I have 4 cats age 11, 11, 6, and 1. I also grew up with cats in my childhood home. In 34 years, I have never had a cat meow at another cat.

None, I buy Motorola. Still have all the features.

Even with a good sound bar and surround sound it’s hard to hear sometimes because audio mixing is made for theaters and some directors just suck.

As a millennial that had Gen X and boomer relatives… So do they, especially as they got older.

So it’s more than just a different instance?

It would be nicer. Religious people would understand that another religion can exist and that not everyone needs to agree with your religion or be dead.

Lemmy is full of tankies.

“Nearly two in five” is not a good number to bring about any actual change.

They are planning to IPO later this year. In preparation they’ve already added shit features or removed some good ones.

Discord will soon be the next piece of shit.

Well my anecdotal evidence has so far been 100% accurate. I’ve done this 6 times between my wife and I and even before I met my wife. All 6 times they have called back a few hours later and said they will accept my cash offer.

MSRP - trade in value(rounded up) = maximum I will pay. I’m 6 for 6 on this.

My wife and I only buy a new car with cash and a trade in. I see what the value is based on the year and mileage. Go on knowing what I want and what I want to pay. They say no, I walk out and get a call from them later. It’s a fucking cash offer they will take a loss just o move inventory and gain a used car they can sell.

Does putting a stop payment no longer work? That’s always been a nice “fuck you, let me cancel” option.

Did you have a stroke?

Some of us went to Mars, to get candy bars.

So I calculated the eligible non-voting population from those links in a comment I made a few months back, and I came up with a little under 90mn. In this thread, I took the non-voting percentage I thought I remembered (~36%) from those Ballotpedia articles, then multiplied that by the total US population (340mn). I should have multiplied it by the eligible population of about 255mn, which gives a little over 90mn.

Nonetheless, the same numbers from the University of Florida are in the Ballotpedia articles. Too bad Ballotpedia didn’t serve that information to you on a silver spoon. Seems like that’s the only way you’ll respond to evidence.

So not only do you admit it was actually 90mn, like I said it was, you also want to insist on being right somehow and claim I can’t find a number in an article you linked that is missing said number.

Holy fuck.

You are still pretending I said something I never did. I asked for proof of your statement. You provided zero proof that it was in fact a small percentage. If others, or yourself are assuming 10%, then I have news for you. 10% is a significant amount. Don’t believe me? Start applying an extra 10% to anything of value or remove 10% of your paycheck. Hell, apply it to anything else not of monetary value, 10% more/less customers. 10% more/less of a metric a business is tracking. 10% more/less of profit margin.

Stop pretending like I said all non-voters were protest voters. Stop insinuating that I said that when you know I didn’t and are trying to prove some weird fucked up point to absolutely no one. I’m not ignoring anything, you only think I am because this conversation is beyond you. I said x, you said y, stop acting like I also referencing z.

Significant: important and deserving of attention; of consequence.

You strawman and now ad hominem. Congratulations are in order. I’m not retarded enough to keep up with you. Mark another tally on your whiteboard to track internet arguments you’ve won.

I don’t see 120m anywhere in those links.

Here is where the 90m that every other person besides you uses.

How Many People Didn’t Vote in the 2024 Election? | National News | U.S. News https://share.google/ghmqy7n78oe6kwvkR

Again, stop putting words in my mouth. Please point out anywhere that I said all non voters are protest voters. I’ll give you a second.

Oh look at that, I never said that. I simply said that protest voters didn’t vote. Here’s a fun fact, some protest voters also voted third party.

Protest voters didn’t vote. That’s what I said and that’s not something you can prove didn’t occur. You are attacking a strawman. Something that is known as fact does not bare the burden of proof.

But I’ll give you proof. Do you want to know how I know protest voters didn’t vote for Red or Blue? It’s simple. It’s because they didn’t vote.

And as another person pointed out the protest voters accounted for about 10% on the non voters. Which, and I’ll just go ahead and tell you, is a significant percentage.

In the world of statistics anything over 5% is often considered statistically significant. How significant depends on context.

I don’t know where you get the 120 from, but that’s also not the claim I’m making.

1. Stop putting words in my mouth.
2. Leave the strawman alone and read more carefully.

It’s common knowledge that protest voters didn’t vote. It’s even in the name. You are making the claim that it’s an insignificant amount.

The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. That’s you, buddy.