EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 3 年前Twitter users right nowsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square356fedilinkarrow-up12.99Kcross-posted to: beyondcombustion@lemmy.beyondcombustion.net
arrow-up12.99KimageTwitter users right nowsh.itjust.worksEmoDuck@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 3 年前message-square356fedilinkcross-posted to: beyondcombustion@lemmy.beyondcombustion.net
minus-squareGeoGio7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-23 年前Hasn’t it already been established that threads would most likely deathhug most of the fediverse? It’s content would be overwhelming and nothing could keep up with it. I’d rather have the fediverse be a more small scale, cozy and niche place*.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 年前In that case you can always use an instance that defederated threads
Hasn’t it already been established that threads would most likely deathhug most of the fediverse? It’s content would be overwhelming and nothing could keep up with it. I’d rather have the fediverse be a more small scale, cozy and niche place*.
In that case you can always use an instance that defederated threads