I highly recommend everyone go see Sound of Freedom in the theaters.

  • canthidium@lemmy.world
    shield
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Got some reports about this post. I’m leaving it up as no rules have been broken and this community is about discussions of movies which this post is, whether you agree with its message or not. I, myself, don’t agree with anything involving Jim Caviezel as he seems to have gone full QAnon, but since this movie is in wide release in theaters, it deserves to have a place to be discussed, as long as that discussion remains civil. OP’s post history doesn’t indicate that they are a troll, so as long as no rules get broken, this post can stay. Please report if any racism, trolling, or insults are noticed. Also feel free to DM if you would like to discuss further.

  • TwoGems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    https://aiptcomics.com/2023/07/07/sound-of-freedom-qanon-caviezel/

    ‘Sound of Freedom’ is a QAnon smokescreen

    Jim Caviezel, best known for his performance as Jesus in the shockingly violent, Mel Gibson-directed The Passion of the Christ, has long since gone over to the dark side of QAnon. Caviezel has a long history of antisemitic and conspiracy-promoting behavior, so it isn’t too surprising he’s now fully red-pilled. In 2021 he spoke at the “Health and Freedom Conference” (where election truther Lin Wood was also a speaker) on the topics of D.U.M.B.s (Deep Underground Military Bases) and the “adrenochroming of children.”

    • Sans_outside@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Where is this Qanon connect proof? Nothing in you article shows proof. It’s all claims. Plus the author of the article is podcaster and not a news write or actually journalist with sources to back up her claims.

        • Sans_outside@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Who about Tom actually testify in front of Congress on his work of stop sex trafficking. Which lead to Congress passing laws allowing the federal government to work with other countries to stop child trafficking.

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            That… Isn’t stating your standard of proof.

            I’m curious what it would take to convince you otherwise, not what it took to convince you of your current stance.

      • TwoGems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-reviews/sound-of-freedom-jim-caviezel-child-trafficking-qanon-movie-1234783837/

        "Caviezel, best known for being tortured to death in Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ, has become a prominent figure on the conspiracist right, giving speeches and interviews in which he hints at an underground holy war between patriots and a sinister legion of evildoers who are harvesting the blood of children. It’s straight-up QAnon stuff, right down to his use of catchphrases like “The storm is upon us.” Here, he gets to act out some of that drama by playing a fictionalized version of Tim Ballard, head of the anti-sex trafficking nonprofit Operation Underground Railroad (O.U.R.), in a feature film that casts the operator as a Batman-style savior for kids sold into the sex trade.

        Ballard himself has dabbled in Q-adjacent conspiracy theories, such as the Wayfair trafficking hoax, while his organization has far-right affinities and a long record of distorting its botched “raids,” which rely on bizarre tactics like asking psychics where to find victims for rescue. Ballard, Caviezel, and others of their ilk had primed the public to accept Sound of Freedom as a documentary rather than delusion by fomenting moral panic for years over this grossly exaggerated “epidemic” of child sex-trafficking, much of it funneling people into conspiracist rabbit holes and QAnon communities. In short, I was at the movies with people who were there to see their worst fears confirmed.

        As implausible as the movie is — it invents a finale where Ballard journeys deep into a jungle alone to pluck a girl from the clutches of guerrilla militants, which he accomplishes by posing as a doctor distributing cholera vaccines — one wonders if it was extreme enough for Caviezel’s liking. The actor has taken to repeating the most grotesque falsehoods of the sprawling QAnon ideology, among them that traffickers are harvesting children’s organs and extracting the chemical compound adrenochrome from their brains before murdering them. "

        “Caviezel has saved that for his promotional media appearances, such as a recent drop-in to Steve Bannon’s show War Room on MyPillow proprietor Mike Lindell’s streaming channel Lindell TV. In the course of their interview, he conveyed the severity of the situation by explaining that an enterprising salesperson would have to move 1,000 barrels of oil to match the sum they’d get for filling one barrel with the rendered corpses of the innocent. Elsewhere, he’s parroted falsehoods about Pizzagate and other underground cells subsisting on human blood, all of it pointing back to a foundation of conspiratorial thought targeting the Jewish and transgender communities.”

        https://www.theguardian.com/film/2023/jul/06/sound-of-freedom-movie-qanon-jim-caviezel

        It’s pretty damn obvious lol

    • Sans_outside@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Wow, it’s just amazing how a movie about sex slave trafficking can be turn some how political. Everything in the article you posted is political talky points. It not about. Left or right the movie is about the traffic of children. Vice is also a terrible source that is only political motivated.

      I thought this sub was about movies not politics.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Everything is political. Movies are deeply and inherently political, and that has nothing to do with anyone thinking that human trafficking is ok.

        If you don’t see and acknowledge the politics of popular media, you just end up eating cultural propaganda.

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes? You’re aware that some people don’t watch Tom Cruise movies because of his association with Scientology, aren’t you?

            But also, some people won’t watch Misison Impossible movies because they’re CIA-supported, America imperialism propaganda films.

            Many others will watch them, making informed decisions about the politics of what they’re viewing, and even more will watch them while being completely blind to them.

            I’m not sure what you think “politics” is, but I can tell that whatever that may be, it’s wrong.

      • TwoGems@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not when you’re being disingenuous as a promoter of this grifter garbage. You don’t care about human trafficking; you only care about shilling this “movie” which doesn’t even have accuracy to it.

  • Hal-5700X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    A movie about how sex slave/children trafficking is a bad thing is a terrible movie and if you like the film. You’re a crazy right winger. I really don’t get you people. But you’re not bad person.