fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Geography@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoCalifornia's third largest city is mostly empty roadswww.sfgate.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up151cross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.online
arrow-up151external-linkCalifornia's third largest city is mostly empty roadswww.sfgate.comfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Geography@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: todayilearned@lemmit.online
minus-squareladicius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 years agoPlanned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California? 400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.
minus-squareZeroCooler@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 years agoPer the article it’s the “third largest by land area.”
minus-squareDudewitbow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoIt might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people
minus-squarexeekei@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoYea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.
minus-squareares35@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agodefinitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.
Planned for 400.000 people? Third largest city in California?
400k isn’t even much in European standards. I don’t get that claim.
Per the article it’s the “third largest by land area.”
It might be by size and not by population, as there are several cities in California that surpass 400k people
Yea, I’m pretty sure I’ve heard of San Diego being referred to as California’s 3rd largest city.
definitely by area. it’s “larger” than san jose, but with a million fewer people.