Vector (or even simple polygons to a degree) already allows both of those things.
Well, the meaning part would require a bit of work but you could put small detail that would only be visible when zoomed in. Like you could make the edge of that iris have little people and houses and trees (though it’d be a massive pain to do manually for the whole thing, that and it’d be kinda wasteful data-wise)
Unless maybe you mean something more like a fractal when you say zoomable. Though there have been vector drawings that people did like that (though I don’t think it actually repeated endlessly, just ended where it started… and it is still manually designed thus finite in content).
Logos should now be infinitely zoomable with differing levels of meaning depending on the depth.
Google Mandelbrot set (or other fractals)
Holy hell
Here’s a really cool one:
https://mandel.gart.nz/
Not the Mandelbrot set, but there’s a lovely interactive app called Fraksl
Thanks. I was around when they gained public popularity in the early 80s.
Logos should now be ML models generating endless video sequences
I don’t know what you mean but I think it would do well at the IPO
Vector (or even simple polygons to a degree) already allows both of those things.
Well, the meaning part would require a bit of work but you could put small detail that would only be visible when zoomed in. Like you could make the edge of that iris have little people and houses and trees (though it’d be a massive pain to do manually for the whole thing, that and it’d be kinda wasteful data-wise)
Unless maybe you mean something more like a fractal when you say zoomable. Though there have been vector drawings that people did like that (though I don’t think it actually repeated endlessly, just ended where it started… and it is still manually designed thus finite in content).
I was merely being hyperbolic in an opposite direction to minimalism.
deleted by creator