RacoonVegetable@reddthat.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoUbuntu rulei.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1206
arrow-up1206external-linkUbuntu rulei.imgur.comRacoonVegetable@reddthat.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareblackjam_alex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 years agoIt’s centralized and controlled by Canonical, it enforces updates and you can’t disable it, sometimes when you uninstall snapd it cames back when you apt update and most importantly, it is painfully slow.
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 years agoOh so it’s the exact kind of enshittification that anyone on Linux went there to escape. Sounds like a deal breaker to me.
minus-squareOisteink@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 years agoSo it’s not about snap, it’s about canonical- and they are why I’m no longer an Ubuntu user. Debian > any downstream distro
minus-squareLuckingFurker (Any/All)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoYeah, sounds extremely shitty. It’d be fine if they didn’t force it
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoAnd the fact they’re forcing it tells you they’re going to do something anti-consumer with it, so even if it doesn’t suck now it will in the future.
It’s centralized and controlled by Canonical, it enforces updates and you can’t disable it, sometimes when you uninstall snapd it cames back when you apt update and most importantly, it is painfully slow.
Oh so it’s the exact kind of enshittification that anyone on Linux went there to escape. Sounds like a deal breaker to me.
So it’s not about snap, it’s about canonical- and they are why I’m no longer an Ubuntu user. Debian > any downstream distro
Yeah, sounds extremely shitty. It’d be fine if they didn’t force it
And the fact they’re forcing it tells you they’re going to do something anti-consumer with it, so even if it doesn’t suck now it will in the future.
Valid point