• poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Confederacies just don’t last very long historically. They either break or become more centralised eventually.

    [citation needed]

    (And they often break apart after briefly becoming more centralized, in an misguided attempt to force unity where there isn’t any anylonger)

    • huey_m@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      First two that come to mind as the most problematic and needing reform are the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the United States nearly collapsing with the confederation is an obvious example. Can you think of any in the modern era that have succeeded long term?

      in an misguided attempt to force unity where there isn’t any anylonger

      Put another way: they were already falling apart. Them falling apart wasn’t the fault of centralising. It was the fault of the loose union giving the governing body too little power to govern effectively. I’ve given some examples of this in the EU with both the military and balkanized access to capital directly leading to us losing lucrative companies we created to the US. It’s like a brain drain but for wealth generating businesses. Military problems are obvious to all with Russia now and the tough spot we’ve found ourselves in outsourcing our defense to the US for decades… what is the solution to these problems if not stronger federal power for the EU? Because they aren’t going away.

      I’d suggest the federalism of the US isn’t what we or most people despise about the US. The two aren’t related.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The US was at most very briefly a confederacy, and the US civil war had little to do with that despite one side calling itself such.

        The EU is an obvious successful modern example, and if you want historical examples, then the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nations lasted a millenium and despite sometimes nominally having an emporer it was practically a confederation.

        And besides, ask some person living in a Democrat majority US state how they feel about the current Trump administration of their federal government interfering with their life and sending a militarized police occupation force into their cities?

        • huey_m@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          The US was at most very briefly a confederacy, and the US civil war had little to do with that despite one side calling itself such.

          I was referring to the articles of confederation, not the Confederacy, and how short lived it was was my point.

          The EU is an obvious successful modern example

          The EU as a governing body and not just a trade group really isn’t that old yet.

          and if you want historical examples, then the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nations lasted a millenium and despite sometimes nominally having an emporer it was practically a confederation.

          The needs of a modern global economy are completely different, though.

          That said, I’m happy to just say we agree to disagree on whether this is broadly true or not.

          I would like a response to my specific points though about trouble the EU is running into and how up fix those problems if not more federal power to the EU? How do you stop EU companies from jumping ship to the US for their large single investment market without a competing consolidated European one? How do we mount our own effective defense force without a central power to manage it?

          And besides, ask some person living in a Democrat majority US state how they feel about the current Trump administration of their federal government interfering with their life and sending a militarized police occupation force into their cities?

          This can still happen (and historically, as the birthplace of fascismhas, has happened) in European nations within said nations, though. That’s nothing inherent to any political system.

          The breakdown of the US political landscape seemingly doesn’t have a lot to do with their version of federalism; most of Europe has far more explicitly central national governments and this hasn’t happened (lately). That kind of abuse of power can happen under literally any system from fascist to socialist.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I would like a response to my specific points though about trouble the EU is running into

            I would first like to have some solid evidence that these are caused by the confederal structure of the EU, and that they would be indeed solved by moving to a federal system. So far that seems to me like pure conjecture and also a huge gamble that could destroy the EU in the process.

            That kind of abuse of power can happen under literally any system from fascist to socialist.

            In a centralized state, yes. But that is exactly what a confederacy isn’t. And the concrete example is that people in other states voted for Trump and thus directly interefered with the affairs of a state that didn’t. That isn’t at all comparable to a state internal problem.

            • huey_m@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I would first like to have some solid evidence that these are caused by the confederal structure of the EU,

              I mean, they are self evident, no? A balkanized investment market exists because there’s no single structure to manage one large one. There’s no single EU military. No?

              So far that seems to me like pure conjecture and also a huge gamble that could destroy the EU in the process.

              I can’t be arsed to give any other than logical arguments such as the above. That’s why I said I’m happy to leave this as an ‘agree to disagree’ moment, because that’s really hard to prove one way or the other, and I consider this casual conversation not debate. So I’m happy to just say we have different perspectives here and call it a day. I’ve cited a few examples, as have you, I don’t think either position is stupid or poorly thought out, I just disagree with your conclusion.

              But that is exactly what a confederacy isn’t. And the concrete example is that people in other states voted for Trump and thus directly interefered with the affairs of a state that didn’t.

              Isn’t this just libertarianism?

              That isn’t at all comparable to a state internal problem.

              You’ll have to explain to me how. Whether you “zoom in” or “zoom out” the principle is the same, as far as I can tell.