Alrighty. Did more research than I should’ve, but based on the grail knights armor, it’s certainly not the 11th century:

• He’s wearing a gambeson, which started becoming a thing in the 12th century (sadly, the cross on his gambeson is nonsense, so I don’t know what order he’s from)
• He has a coif that’s not integrated into a hauberk, which is also a later thing (earliest depictions I found that could’ve been separate coifs are from the 12th century)
• He has, as far as I can guess, an Oakeshott type XI sword, which again, is a 12th century thing
• And lasty his mail gauntlets, which gave me some confusion. Mail mittens and gauntlets that were integrated into the hauberk were a thing in the 13th century. But separate ones only started existing around 1300, which puts us into the 14th century, and more importantly, after the fall of Acre

So my conclusions is: Based on the gauntlets and the nonsensical cross on his gambeson, I’m pretty sure that this guy is just…

A fucking LARPer

That’s right. He’s some 14th century schmuck that’s pretending to be a crusader and couldn’t even bother researching accurate heraldry. And this fraud has been doing this charade for 600 years. What a damn nerd

If the assertion by Indiana Jones in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, set in 1938, that the Grail Knight and his brothers began guarding the Holy Grail 700 years prior, around 1238, is accurate, then the siblings can’t be knights of the First Crusade per Walter Donovan’s “bedtime story” earlier in the film. The First Crusade lasted from 1095, as pointed out specifically by the knight in Rob MacGregor’s novelization, until 1099. In the novel, however, Jones says 800 years instead.

Americans and history lol

Grail Knight: I knew you’d come. But my strength has left me.

in the porn parody, this line carries more weight