• Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    il y a 5 heures

    1.2 billion of free money to not do work. Wow the trump administration sure knows how to waist money.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    il y a 5 heures

    If I was president I would order every new wind turbine be planted out side every trump golf course in the United states. 6 per golf course and tackey hotel

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    il y a 6 heures

    So it’s not just the american “business” people that are corrupt, it’s “business” people everywhere, throughout the land. Time to go back to hunting and gathering methinks. /s

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      il y a 18 heures

      Depends if I am an american or not. Hospital costs factor into this if you live in the home of the fee.

      As a non american? I don’t know $500K or so? I mean it would suck but not the worst thing to be paid for.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        il y a 7 heures

        That would probably leave me with a lifelong harm. My body is important. I’d only start considering it at $100 million.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          il y a 2 heures

          A bit steep, but I get the idea. As I get older the price for harm goes down though.

    • mecen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      il y a 4 heures

      I wonder if that company earned more from being banned from making wind turbines or would be from selling electricity

    • stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      il y a 23 heures

      just so people are aware, this is FIFTH TIME the administration has done this: Source

      If this sounds at all familiar, it’s not your imagination. In March, the Republican administration announced that it had agreed to pay a foreign company almost $1 billion in American taxpayer money to abandon two wind farm projects that would have produced enough electricity to power more than 1.3 million homes and businesses […]

      At the administration’s insistence, the company will instead proceed with different energy projects that will cost more and pollute more. [thanks to] President Donald Trump, many American consumers will pay for the privilege of paying more to turn on the lights, all while polluting our own air.

      Then in April, it happened again, when the Republican administration announced plans to pay energy companies almost $900 million to abandon plans for two offshore wind farms. Two months later, Team Trump spent $765 million to buy back another group of offshore wind leases.

      In late June, a fourth example emerged, when the administration announced plans to pay Duke Energy $129 million to abandon an offshore wind project off the coast of North Carolina.

      With a fifth instance this week, the combined price tag for the developments is approaching $4 billion.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      il y a 1 jour

      Both countries have governments run by very stupid, selfish manbabies and their cronies.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    il y a 1 jour

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on “costly subsidies”.

    Thank god we’re not paying costly subsidies

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      il y a 1 jour

      $1.2 Billion to make a project not happen sounds like a pretty costly subsidy.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        il y a 1 jour

        They are being paid $1.2B to build gas power projects in the US. Whereas before they were being paid to build wind power in the US. They are not being paid to do nothing.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          il y a 8 heures

          No they aren’t. They are investing in gas power projects, but the US government is not paying them the money to do that. The money is solely for breach of contract regarding the wind power project.

          • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            il y a 1 jour

            RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              il y a 1 jour

              Yes, which is not what you said before. RWE is getting paid for nothing to then invest its own money in other projects. The difference is ownership. The difference matters.

              • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                il y a 1 jour

                From what I can tell, RWE would have owned the wind projects before as well.

                RWE said it has agreed to relinquish its leases off the California and Louisiana coasts as well as in the New York Bight.

                They wouldn’t need to relinquish leases if the US was the owner and RWE was simply a contractor building stuff for them.

                • ywain@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  il y a 23 heures

                  That’s 1.2 billion - 900 million, and still a profit making venture. Paid by the US government to still make money. US capitalism.

                • Jiral@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  il y a 1 jour

                  Your interpretation doesn’t sound like the only possible one. Do you have a source that is clearly stating these things?

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          il y a 1 jour

          Are you sure? Because wording isn’t clear, but pay out sounds like a … pay out, not ‘please, build something else’. 🤷

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      il y a 1 jour

      The US could switch off their nuclear powerplants to accelerate the transition to hydrocarbons.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          il y a 1 jour

          They already know. Merkel saved their oil industry by making electricity for cars expensive.

          • Thorry@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            il y a 1 jour

            Yeah but what if Germany were to be hit by a 9.1 earthquake followed by a huge tsunami and have the disaster cause the need for emergency generators that were flooded by the tsunami? We can’t have that risk! Shutting down all nuclear reactors was the only option.

        • Free Trampoline!?@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          il y a 1 jour

          Won’t make a dent either way. The entire climate situation basically depends on the death of capitalism, egotystical billionares taking fault(LMAO) and overhauling our entire way of life at this point.

    • Starya67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      il y a 1 jour

      They’d already spent that billion on preparations. If they hadn’t received their money back the shit would have hit the fan.

    • Sprossnix@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      il y a 1 jour

      Only if you reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

  • deeferg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    il y a 1 jour

    Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on “costly subsidies”.

    I actually want to vomit from how stupid as fuck that whole country is to not have done anything to these people.

  • angelmountain@lemy.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    il y a 1 jour

    This just seems so dumb and stupid on all kinds of levels. What does Trump think he’s gaining from this in the end? I just don’t see it.

    Is he just getting paid by his friends with oil companies? Is that it?

    • siftmama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      il y a 1 jour

      Delays in becoming independent of oil at the expense of the taxpayer (not of oil companies).

  • Mereo@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    il y a 1 jour

    This is incredibly stupid. While China and the rest of the world are leading the charge in renewable energy, the U.S. is set to remain in the Stone Age due to pure hubris and short-term profit gains.

    Paying 1.2 billion to get rid of that technology is just ideologically short-sighted. It’s simply stupid.

    • ywain@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      il y a 23 heures

      Exactly, European energy generation during an extreme summer has shown that renewables are the most reliable, until systems are in place for storage. The world can’t rely on fossil fuels or even nuclear at the moment due to climate change.